SW 8104 Project Seminar II (1 credit)

Spring Semester, 2005 

Instructor: Lynn Bye                                              Office Hours:  I am happy to meet with you
218 Bohannon Hall                                 any time by appointment
726-8492 (Office)           
724-3211 (Home)
e-mail:  lbye@d.umn.edu

OVERVIEW OF THE COURSE
SW 8104 Project Seminar II is the final course in the research sequence (previous classes were: SW 8102 Advanced Research and SW 8103 Project Seminar I) offered by the Department of Social Work.  All students in Project Seminar II are required to have a research pre-proposal which was approved by their first reader.   Approval of the second reader should be attained by the second seminar.  The overall purpose of this course is to provide students with the structured support and knowledge they need to complete the final stages of their Master’s Research Paper. The course will include individual consultation with the instructor and meetings with other students registered for this section of Project Seminar II.  The seminars will provide an opportunity for students to share the progress and challenges they are facing on their research projects and to receive feedback and support for other students and the instructor.

COURSE OBJECTIVES
By the end of the course, the students will be able to:
1)   Collect the data for their Master’s Research Project.     
2)   Analyze the data for their research project.
     
3)   Calculate and interpret statistics and other forms of analysis (quantitative) commonly used in social science research.
     
4)   Write a complete draft of their final Master’s Research paper (Plan B).
5)  Apply critical thinking skills and a systematic problem solving approach within a professional context.
6) Practice within the values and ethics of the social work profession.

7)  Evaluate research studies and apply findings to practice.
8)  Demonstrate cultural competence with a variety of client populations, colleagues and members of the community.

COURSE REQUIREMENTS
1)   Students should attend all seminars unless they have a valid excuse. The instructor should be notified PRIOR to the absence if possible (voice mail/e-mail).     
2)   Students should come prepared to participate in class discussions.
     
3)   Each student must submit by the second seminar a revised timeline of their research with specific tasks needed for completion of their project.  These will be reviewed each seminar for progress.
     
4)   If students have not already done so, they should have their pre-proposal approved by their second reader by the fourth seminar session.
     
5)   Students should provide appropriate feedback to other students.  Students will be expected to critique other research projects and provide appropriate feedback and assistance.

ASSIGNMENTS:
1) Research Timeline- You must submit by the second seminar a timeline of your research with specific tasks needed for completion of your research project.  These will be reviewed each seminar for progress.     
2) Approval of the Second Reader- If you do not have your pre-proposal approved by your second reader you should do so by the second seminar.
     
3) Class Discussion-You are expected to participate fully in seminar discussions including problem solving with other students.
     
4) Presentation of Research Project- You are expected to present the progress on your research project on a regular basis in class.
     
5)  Provide appropriate feedback to other students- You will be expected to critique other research projects and provide appropriate feedback and assistance.
 

GRADES
Students will be graded with either Satisfactory or Not Satisfactory (S or N).  To receive a Satisfactory grade, you must attend seminars regularly, complete assignments at an acceptable standard, participate in seminar discussions and feedback, and submit a complete draft of your final research paper to the instructor. An “S” will not actually be entered on your transcript until you have completed your Final Oral Exam.

READINGS
American Psychological Association (1994 or 2001). Publication Manual of the APA (4th or 5th ed.). 
Washington, D.C.: Author. 

Plan B Research Project Handbook, MSW Program, UMD, Duluth 

Handouts on writing the research report and other relevant topics will be provided. 

Computer Software (optional): SPSS is available in the UMD bookstore in the Sociology section. It may also be available at the UMD Computer Store. This version can only handle 50 variables and has other limitations. The SPSS Graduate Pack is available through the UMD Computer Corner.  This version has very few limitations. Another option is to pay the computer lab fee to access an expanded version of SPSS.

DISABILITIES
My highest priority is for our classroom and course work to facilitate participation and exchange. I am eager to make accommodations to guarantee to students with disabilities access to class sessions, course material, and the activities of the class. You are encouraged to contact the Access Center-Disability Services to discuss and arrange reasonable accommodations. In addition, please let me know as soon as possible if you have a disability for which accommodations will be requested.

EVALUATION OF COURSE AND INSTRUCTION
During the term I will solicit feedback from you in several ways.  First, I will encourage you to offer feedback at any time as the course progresses.  Feel free to tell me what is valuable and useful and what is not.  At mid-quarter and at the end of the quarter, I will ask you to fill out forms asking for you reactions and feedback.  I appreciate any feedback you may offer and will try to incorporate what I can in order to make the course more interesting and valuable.

GROUND RULES FOR DISCUSSION (We will discuss these guidelines further in class.)
Since this course includes a variety of topics that could raise controversy or conflict, the following ground rules for how we discuss sensitive topics are proposed.  These ground rules are adapted from Lynn Weber Cannon's "Fostering Positive Class, Race, and Gender Dynamics in the Classroom," which appeared in Women's Studies Quarterly, 1990, 1&2, 130-132.

  We can assume that discrimination exists in many forms (e.g. sexism, racism, classism, ageism, homophobia, anti-Semitism, ableism, etc.).  Any critical understanding of these various -isms means that we need to recognize that we have been taught misinformation about our own groups and well as about members of other groups.  This is true for both dominant (e.g. white, male, upper class, heterosexual, able-bodied, etc.) and subordinate (e.g. people of color, women, poor and working class, gay/Lesbian, disabled, etc.) group members.

  Based on these assumptions then, let's agree that we cannot be blamed for the misinformation we have learned, but we should take personal responsibility for repeating misinformation after we have learned otherwise.  This is not to suggest that any one person has a corner on truth or that disagreement with any one idea carries with it any kind of punitive response.  People and groups are not to be blamed for their subordinate positions.

Let's assume that people are always doing the best they can.   Let us actively pursue information about our own groups and those of others.  Let us share information about our own groups with other members of the class but never demean, devalue, or in any way put down people for their experiences.

Essentially what this means is that we can talk about ideas the class agrees to discuss, but that we will do so with respect for each other as human beings.  We will not engage in depersonalized name-calling.  We each have an obligation to actively combat the myths and stereotypes about our own groups and other groups so that we can break down the walls which prohibit group cooperation and group gain.  Let's create a safe atmosphere for open discussion.  Thus, at times, members of the class may wish to share writing or make comments that they do not want repeated outside the classroom.  If so, the student will preface his/her remarks with a request and the class will agree not to repeat the remarks.

TENTATIVE TIMETABLE

Seminar 1:  January 20 at 5:00 p.m.
Check in on status including presentation of timeline for research completion. Oral reports will be given on the topic and status of each research project. All students are expected to provide productive feedback to one another.  Distribute handouts and review Plan B Masters Research Handbook. 

 Assignments for Seminar 1:
A
) Prepare timeline for completion of research with specific tasks, dates of expected completion, and who is doing what (if more than one researcher).
B) If applicable, attain pre-proposal approval of the second reader.
C) If applicable, submit human subjects form for approval.

D) Each student should be prepared to share information on his or her research project.  This verbal report to the class should include: research questions/hypothesis; research methodology; research questions/hypothesis; data collection instruments; data collection plans; status of human subjects approval, and the greatest challenges remaining.
All students are expected to provide productive feedback to one another.
 Students should use the MSW Plan B Research Proposal Outline to guide their progress.   

Seminar 2:  
Each research group will provide a brief check in on timeline for research completion.  Areas of concern will be surfaced for more in-depth discussion.  As a group we will conduct a critical review of each research question being addressed by the members in the seminar. Are they stated as clearly as possible?  Do they address the “so what” issue?  Who would be interested in the answer to the question and how could they use the information generated from the study?  Does the research question address diversity issues? We will be using the Feedback Form for Plan B Proposal-p.1 on page 13 of your Plan B Handbook at each seminar session.  All students are expected to provide productive feedback to one another. 

Seminar 3: 
Members of the seminar will summarize where they are at in the research process.  This session will focus on effective writing techniques including topic sentences, smooth transitions between sentences and paragraphs, the use of headings and sub-headings, variation in the length of sentences and the choice of words, reducing unnecessary words, good word usage, not using contractions or slang, making verbs agree in number with the subject, appropriate use of APA format, using parallel structure, and using dangling participles at the end of sentences (in, of, it, to, for, etc.).

Seminar 4:
M
embers of the seminar will provide a brief check in on timeline progress for research completion.  Discussion will focus on the various sections of the paper and how to tie them together in the research report.  We will focus on: 1) Writing a compelling introduction to the paper, 2) Reviewing the literature in a way that synthesizes information from several studies and 3) Relating the literature findings to a clearly defined research question.  Students should be referring to the APA manual and adhere to that format.  All students are expected to provide productive feedback to one another. 

Seminar 5:
Members in the seminar will provide a brief check in on timeline progress for research completion.  Discussion will continue to focus on tying the various sections of the paper together.  Specifically, we will look at: 1) Writing a compelling introduction to the paper, 2) Reviewing the literature in a way that synthesizes information from several studies and 3) Relating the literature findings to a clearly defined research question.  Students should be referring to the APA manual and adhere to that format.  All students are expected to provide productive feedback to one another. Assignment:  Student will be asked to trade the sections of their papers containing the written introduction, literature review and research question.  These partial papers will be taken home for individual critical review and brought back to the next seminar with written feedback and suggestions.

Seminar 6:
Members of the seminar will provide a brief check in on timeline progress for research completion.  Discussion will focus on how to present the “Methods” sections of the paper including a clear description of the population and sample, the research design, the operational definitions, the method of data collection and the method of data analysis.  Students should be referring to the APA manual and adhere to that format.  All students are expected to provide productive feedback to one another. 

Seminar 7:
Members of the seminar will provide a brief check in on timeline progress for research completion.  Discussion will continue to focus on how to present the “Methods” sections of the paper including a clear description of the population and sample, the research design, the operational definitions, the method of data collection and the method of data analysis.  Students should be referring to the APA manual and adhere to that format.  All students are expected to provide productive feedback to one another.   Assignment:  Students will trade the Methods sections of their papers and take them home to do a critical review of that section for each other.  These sections of the paper will be returned the author of the paper the following week.  After receiving the written feedback the author of the paper will share what was learned from the experience.  

Seminar 8:
This session will be devoted to the discussion of the Methods sections of the research papers.  The written feedback on the Methods sections of the paper will be returned the author of the paper.  After receiving the written feedback the author of the paper will share what was learned from the experience.   

Seminar 9:
During this session we will focus on the Results and Discussion section of the paper.  What were the findings?  How do these results fit with previous research findings?  What are the implications of the study?  How can your study be used as a stepping stone for further research?  What were limitations of your study?  Who should know about your findings?  Where could you publish and present your study?
 

Seminar 10:
During this session we will critically review 1 entire research paper written by the members of the seminar.
 

Seminar 11:
No class today.  Your instructor is presenting at the National School Social Work Conference. 

Seminar 12: 

During this session we will critically review at least 2 entire research papers written by the members of the seminar.
 

Seminar 13: 
Celebration of completed projects!  Those who have not completed their project will need to submit a revised timeline for research completion.   Incomplete forms can be submitted, if needed, at this time. 

Bibliography 

Berg, B. (1998).  Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. (3rd Ed).  Allyn & Bacon: Boston.           

Healey, J., Boli, J. Babie, E. & Halley, F. (1999).  Exploring social issues using SPSS for Windows 95.  Thousands Oaks, CA:  Pine Forge Press.           

Royce, D. & Thyer, B (1996).  Program Evaluation: an introduction. (2nd Ed).  Nelson-Hall, Chicago.           
Rubin, A. & Babbie, E. (1997).  Research Methods for Social
Work, (3rd Ed).  Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.           

Seidman, I.E. (1991).
  Interviewing as Qualitative Research: a Guide for Researchers in Education and Social Sciences. Teachers College Press:
Columbia University: NY.           

Weinbach, R.W. & Grinnell, R.M. (1997).  Statistics for Social
Workers. Longman, NY.

Sources for APA format:

 http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/research/r_apa.html

http://www.psywww.com/resource/apacrib.htm

http://www.apastyle.org/