POLICIES & PROCESS FOR EMPLOYEE APPRAISALS
BACKGROUND - What is the University’s intent on performance
reviews?
While there is no one unified policy covering every employee group,
the requirement of regular performance reviews for all University staff
is clearly stated in various places:
In any case, you should conduct an annual, formal, written review
of each employee’s performance.
Manager’s Toolkit, Performance Management
Performance – annual review required for all employees (excludes
individuals who fall under the comprehensive review requirement).
University of Minnesota Business Process: Performance Review
Tracking
[Note: Comprehensive review requirement is for deans and higher.]
As part of an ongoing performance management system, it is expected
that both full-time and part-time academic professional and administrative
(P&A) staff (93xx, 96xx, 97xx) undergo a review of their performance
on an annual basis with a written evaluation prepared and delivered
by the responsible administrator.
Performance Appraisals for Academic Professional and Administrative
Staff, Policy 4.7.1
It is also clear that as units elect to move towards performance or merit
pay, the University will be looking closely at the process they have in
place for regular and ongoing performance evaluation.
PURPOSE
Employee performance appraisals are a counseling tool for the rating
supervisor and the employee to use to assess and discuss job performance.
The focus of the performance appraisal process should be to establish
a mutual understanding between the supervisor and the employee on the
requirements for effective job performance.
PROCESSES
PROBATIONARY
APPRAISAL
ANNUAL
APPRAISAL
TIMELINE FOR THE ANNUAL REVIEW PROCESS PDF
WORD
FOLLOW-UP
ON PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
HRMS TRACKING: http://www1.umn.edu/ohr/img/assets/10086/empreview.pdf
|