| NEEDS IMPROVEMENT | SATISFACTORY | ACCOMPLISHED | EXCELLENT | |
| EFFECTIVENESS and CREATIVITY
The force of language, imagery, argument. |
*Writing lacks impact
* Little consideration of assignment requirements * Narrow range of vocabulary * Little or no figurative language * Scripted or predictable writing |
*Clear writing
* Assignment requirements are considered * Predictable range of vocabulary * Moves from predictable writing to moments of insight * Some descriptive language |
*Writing sustains reader's interest
* Assignment requirements are met * Meaning often enhanced by vivid language * Often makes effective use of descriptive language |
*Writing is vivid and detailed
* Assignment requirements are exceeded * Impact strengthened by dynamic and vivid language * Insightful and vivid descriptive language |
| COHERENCE
Skill or ingenuity in ideas and design. |
*Vague thesis and unclear indication of
essay purpose
* Random organization * Abrupt transitions * Vague ideas |
*General or broad thesis and indication
of essay purpose
* Apparent organization * Awkward transitions * Undeveloped ideas |
*Unified thesis and clear indication of
essay purpose
* Focused organization * Smooth transitions * Some interesting ideas |
*Clear, insightful thesis and specific indication
of essay's purpose
* Helpful organization * Seamless transitions * Memorable ideas |
| LOGIC
Coherence of argument, logic of organization, originality and effectiveness of evidence and reasoning. |
*Argument is unfocused
* Includes few or no supporting examples and details from the texts * Little correlation between analysis and supporting examples * Conclusion is weak or missing |
*Thesis conveys opinion
* Supporting examples and quotes from the texts relate to thesis * Makes some connection between analysis and supporting examples * Conclusion may be abrupt or sketchy |
*Introduction establishes argument and thesis
* Effective supporting examples and quotes from texts frequently used to defend thesis and ideas * Analysis clarifies supporting examples and quotes * Conclusion reiterates thesis |
*Introduction vividly establishes argument
and thesis
* Effective supporting examples and quotes from the texts are used to clarify and explain thesis and supporting ideas * Analysis amplifies supporting examples and quotes * Conclusion synthesizes argument |
| CLARITY
Free of mechanical errors and confusion, easily understandable. |
*Vague communication
* Grammar, punctuation, or spelling errors seriously inhibit communication * Paragraphs lack focus * No clear relationship between introduction and conclusion * Quotations are not correctly integrated into the discussion or cited using MLA style |
*Clear communication
* Some distracting grammar, spelling and/or punctuation errors * Paragraphs contain more than one central idea * Introduction relates to conclusion * Quotations are correct, but are not smoothly integrated. |
*Effective communication
* Occasional grammar, spelling or punctuation errors * Each paragraph clarifies one central idea * Development made from introduction to conclusion * Quotations are correctly used and cited |
*Clear, precise and persuasive communication
* Reader is not distracted by grammar, spelling or punctuation errors * Each paragraph develops and analyzes one key idea * Sustained development and coherence from introduction to conclusion * Quotations are correctly and smoothly used. |