MgtS 4461 – Business and Society
Lesson plan: February 14, 2008
Ethical problems of managers
Goals of todayÕs lesson:
In this class, we introduce
you to the daily life of the manager.
We expose you to some basic employment issues (dealing with recalcitrant
employees; hiring, discipline, and termination issues; workforce diversity).
ÒEmployment BasicsÓ
Q1: Dealing with
recalcitrant employees:
Consider the short case on page 176-177. This is actually a situation you may
easily confront early in your career.
For example, you may start your career as a management trainee in a
local bank. You answer to the
branch manager, and you have 3-4 tellers who answer to you. The tellers are likely to be middle
aged females (this is a career still somewhat ghettoized by sex), and have far
less education than you do. (Thus,
theyÕll likely further perceive you to be Òa snippy youngster who thinks s/heÕs
really great Õcause s/heÕs got an education.Ó) In your group, think about your strategy for dealing with
this situation.
1a. If you approach your supervisor, what request do
you make? How do you want him or
her to act? (Do you want them to
handle the situation directly, or do you want them to stop acting a certain
way?) What will her / his possible
responses be to your comments?
Think through the full possible range. What is an acceptable response, and how do you maximize your
chances of getting it? (Note
– if youÕve actually encountered this on the job, talk about your actual
experiences instead. Did what you
did work? Why or why not?)
1b. Should you approach your subordinates
directly? If you do, how do you
want them to change? What are
their responses likely to be to your orders / requests? (And do you frame your communication as
an order or a request? What
determines that?) How do you
maximize your chances of succeeding?
(Again, if youÕve actually experienced this, what happened?)
1c. What seems to be the best course of action (the
one most likely to produce the outcomes you desire)? Why?
1d. Are there any ethical considerations in your
choice of actions? What are they?
Q2: Hiring and relevant
job qualifications:
Read ÒHiring Case #2Ó on page
155.
2a. Generally, do you believe that non-work related
criteria (such as personal appearances) should be considered in hiring an
employee? What does the law say on
this point? What are the limits?
2b. Think about organizations you are familiar with
that seem to hire based on criteria such as physical appearance. Can they make a reasonable business
case to support their position?
Why or why not?
2c. Do you hire the homely sales manager? Why or why not?
Q3: Disciplining
employees:
Read the short case on
discipline on page 159.
3a. If you were StevenÕs manager, what should you
do? How do you handle this
specific situation? Is this worth
canning Steven over? Why or why
not?
3b. More generally, should you have Òa law for the
rich and a law for the poor?Ó Why
or why not? What signals does it
send to have a two-tier system? If
you want only a single system, how could you take into account the
eccentricities of your stars?
ÒWorkforce DiversityÓ
The portion of todayÕs class
on diversity will be a multi-phase class discussing issues surrounding
diversity on the campus and in the workplace. My goal for today is that you come to have a better
understanding of what diversity is and why it will be important for you as you
enter your managerial careers.
Phase 1: On your own, please
answer the following question:
I
believe that diversity on the campus is a good idea. (Circle your response.)
1 =
strongly agree.
2 =
agree a little.
3 =
neutral.
4 =
disagree a little.
5 =
strongly disagree.
Phase 2: In your small
groups, please come up with a definition of the term Òdiversity.Ó Please be as broad as possible in your
thinking. (I.e., please move
beyond ÒitÕs having a bunch of (fill in ethnic group of your choice) take up a
bunch of valuable class space.Ó)
Phase 3: In your small
groups, please start to come to grips with why many people find the concept of
diversity so offensive. Is it the
concept itself that is offensive, or the way you see it being operationalized? (Leads to discussion of research
methods & operationalization of constructs.)
Phase 4: In your small groups, please look at
either the positive or negative aspects of diversity on the campus. I will assign each group to look at one
or the other perspective.
|
Positive aspects of
diversity |
Negative aspects of
diversity |
|
|
|
Phase 5: I will select (at random) a small group
of students to meet (for 3 minutes) and devise a summary of arguments. Each group will have 2 minutes to
present their case to the class.
After each presentation, each group may ask the opposing group one
question. At the end of this, I
will ask you to evaluate the effectiveness of each groupÕs arguments.
Phase 6: On your own, please
re-answer the following question:
I
believe that diversity on the campus is a good idea. (Circle your response.)
1 =
strongly agree.
2 =
agree a little.
3 =
neutral.
4 =
disagree a little.
5 =
strongly disagree.
Has
your opinion on this issue changed?
Why or why not?
Phase 7: Why does diversity
matter? (What happens when you get
into the Òreal worldÓ?)
Conclusions: