Evolution Lecture 26
Chapter 16
Topics for today:
•
Modes of
speciation and supporting evidence
1. Allopatric speciation (finished last lecture)
2.
Peripatric
speciation
3.
Parapatric
speciation
4.
Sympatric
speciation
•
Definition
of a subspecies
•
Rates of
speciation
EvoBeaker:
Snails
Exercise 6
B. Peripatric speciation:
founder effect
Fig. 16.12
Example 1 From
natural populations
o Compare phylogenetic patterns of widespread species and closely related peripheral species
o Peripheral species should be nested in widespread species
o Confounded with divergence due to selection
§ Lab population bottlenecked to 1, 4, or 16 pairs
§ Behavioral attributes altered by the founder event
Fig. 16.14
Example 2: Experimental evidence
for peripatric speciation
o 2 fruit fly species bottlenecked for 40-50 generations
o Do they chose their own founder population (positive assortative mating)?
o Do they chose other founder populations (negative assortative mating)?
o No evidence that genetic drift results in reproductive isolation
Fig. 16.14
C. Perapatric speciation:
differences in selection
· Different habitats with strong selection and a sharp boarder
· Individuals with wrong genotype fail
· Probably common but difficult to demonstrate
Example 1 – from natural population
· Grass has evolved tolerance to heavy metals in mine tailings, Anthoxanthum odoratum
· Metal tolerant plants flower earlier
·
Evolved capacity for self-fertilization
Fig. 16.15
D. Sympatric speciation
· Highly controversial
· Barrier to gene flow arises within a population with no spatial barrier to gene flow
· Most likely caused by strong disruptive selection
· Strong selection for different resources cause heterozygotes to have low fitness
Example 1 – From natural population
· Apple maggot fly’s native host is hawthorn
· Emerge in late summer, mate, lay eggs on fruit
· Larvae hatch, drop to ground, overwinter
·
First observed as pest on apples in eastern
· Apples set fruit ~ 3 wks earlier
· Gene exchange is limited (disruptive selection)
Fig. 16.18
Example 2 - Experimental
evidence for sympatric speciation
· Fruit flies subjected to disruptive selection
· Most studies show no reproductive isolation
· Exception when selection is based on trait that causes assortative mating:
o Development time
o Habitat choice
· Developed partial reproductive isolation
Fig. 16.17
Definition of a subspecies
· Leopard frogs previous considered one species with subspecies
· Studies at overlap show reproductive isolation
· Phylogenetic studies show two clades with 27 species
· A named geographic race; a set of populations of a species that share one or more distinctive features and occupy a different geographic area from other subspecies (pg 552 Futuyma)
Example: Six subspecies of Box turtles (Terrapene
1) Eastern 2) Desert 3) Three Toed
4)
How fast does speciation occur?
Two different measurements
1. Time for speciation (TFS)
· Time from beginning of differentiation to reproductive isolation
2. Biological speciation interval (BSI)
· Time between branch points
Fig. 16.21
Estimate of Time for Speciation (TFS)
How much sequence divergence is there between young sister taxa?Molecular divergence in birds
· 2% @ 1 myr
· Young species pairs have @ 4% sequence divergence so TFS @ 2 myr
· Ranges from 0.23 - 5 myr (average 2.6 my)
· Upper bound because don’t know exact time of speciation
Fig. 16.22
How to measure Biological Speciation Interval (BSI)?
Need to know
·
Time
since most recent common ancestor (t)
·
Current
number of species in the clade (Nt)
·
Solve
for R (diversification rate,
species per unit time)
·
Time
between branching points (BSI) = 1/R (time per species)
Assumptions
·
Rate of
speciation is exponential
·
No
extinction
Nt
= eRt
Fig. 16.21
Estimates of TFS & BSI a have wide range
Fig. 16.23
Why are speciation rates so variable?
The mechanism of speciation matters
·
Very
slow if speciation occurs by mutation and drift of neutral alleles
·
Faster
if driven by ecological or sexual selection
·
Extremely
fast in cases of polyploidy or speciation due to recombination
The stability of the environment matters
·
Divergent
populations are likely to come into contact eventually
·
Divergence
lost through interbreeding if reproductive isolation has not yet evolved
Relationship between environmental stability and rates of
speciation
·
Speciation
rates higher in a stable environment
o
Higher speciation
of trilobites during stable environments
o
No
speciation of beetles during glacial era