Karl Marx
Development of Sociological Theory
Sociology 1400
UMD
MAY 5, 1818 - MARCH 14, 1883 (IN HIS ARM CHAIR)
I. THE ECONOMIC BASIS OF A SOCIETY DETERMINES ITS SOCIAL STRUCTURE
- A. THE INSTITUTIONS
- B. THE PSYCHOLOGY OF THE PEOPLE
- C. THE STATE AND LAW, ETC.
CRITIQUE OF HEGEL'S IDEALISM
- FOR HEGEL, THE EMPIRICAL WORLD IS NOT REAL, BUT MUST BE UNDERSTOOD AS
THOUGHTS
- FOR MARX, REAL PROBLEMS GO IGNORED OR UNRESOLVED. IF PEOPLE ARE
ALIENATED FROM REAL WORLD THINGS, YOU CAN NOT FIX THAT BY DEFERRING TO
THE HERE AFTER
- HEGEL EMPHASIZED THE ULTIMATE REALITY OF THOUGHT
THIS LEAD TO MISPERCEIVED HUMAN NATURE
CORRECT ABOUT LABOR, BUT NOT MENTAL LABOR REAL, PHYSICAL LABOR
TO MEET REAL PHYSICAL NEEDS
- REJECTS HEGEL'S RELIGIOUS MOTIF
RELIGION IS THE SIGH OF THE OPPRESSED CREATURE, THE SENTIMENT OF A HEARTLESS
WORLD, AND THE SOUL OF SOULLESS CONDITIONS. IT IS THE OPIUM OF THE PEOPLE. THE
ABOLITION OF RELIGION AS THE ILLUSORY HAPPINESS OF MEN, IS A DEMAND FOR THEIR
REAL HAPPINESS. THE CALL TO ABANDON THEIR ILLUSIONS ABOUT THEIR CONDITIONS IS A
CALL TO ABANDON A CONDITION WHICH REQUIRES ILLUSIONS. THE CRITICISM OF RELIGION IS, THEREFORE, THE EMBRYONIC CRITICISM OF THIS VALE OF TEARS OF WHICH RELIGION IS THE HALO.
- RELIGION CREATES THE IMAGE OF A COMMUNITY OF PEOPLE (HARMONY, STABILITY,
EQUILIBRIUM), IN FACT LIFE IS RIDDLED WITH CONFLICT & SUFFERING
II. ALIENATION
WHAT IS BAD ABOUT CAPITALISM? CAPITALISM PRODUCES ALIENATION
- ALIENATION FROM PRODUCTS
- SOMEONE ELSE HAS CONTROL OF THEM,
- THE WORKER BECOMES A COMMODITY
- "...THE MORE VALUE HE [SHE] (THE WORKER) CREATES THE MORE
WORTHLESS HE [SHE] BECOMES." THIS IS IN PROPORTION TO WHAT S/HE
PRODUCES.
- ALIENATED FROM THE PROCESS OF WORK.
- CAN'T GET NO SATISFACTION!
- WORK IS NOT FULFILLING IN ITSELF BUT MERELY MEANS
- P74, ECONOMIC AND PHILOSOPHIC MANUSCRIPTS
- WHAT MAKES HUMANS HUMAN?
ANSWER IS FOUND HERE AND IN THE GERMAN IDEOLOGY
- ALIENATION FROM OTHERS
HUMAN RELATIONS BECOME MARKET RELATIONS
- ALIENATION FROM SPECIES-BEING
- HUMANS ARE SHAPED BY SOCIETY, SHAPED BY PAST CULTURE AND
PRACTICE, YET PEOPLE CONTINUE TO RESHAPE SOCIETY THROUGH THEIR
ACTIVITIES;
- ALIENATED FROM SOCIAL AND SOCIAL SUBORDINATED TO THE INDIVIDUAL
WHAT IS GOOD ABOUT CAPITALISM?
III. THE DYNAMICS OF SOCIAL CHANGE
THE MATERIALIST CONCEPTION OF HISTORY
THE DYNAMIC OF HISTORICAL CHANGE IS THE CONFLICT BETWEEN THE FORCES OF
PRODUCTION AND THE RELATIONS OF PRODUCTION.
- IDEAS ARE NOT FREE FLOATING IN PREEXISTING CATEGORIES WAITING TO BE
DEVELOPED
- THEY ARISE AS A BY-PRODUCT OF THE BRAIN THROUGH INTERACTION WITH THE
SENSUOUS WORLD
GIDDENS (21)
"HUMAN CONSCIOUSNESS IS CONDITIONED IN DIALECTICAL INTERPLAY
BETWEEN SUBJECT AND OBJECT, IN WHICH MAN (SIC) ACTIVELY SHAPES THE WORLD
HE LIVES IN AT THE SAME TIME AS IT SHAPES HIM (SIC).
- WHAT IS HUMAN HISTORY? THE CONTINUOUS PROCESS OF PRODUCING, SATISFYING AND REPRODUCING HUMAN NEEDS
- LABOR AND THE LABOR PROCESS IS CENTRAL
- CREATIVE LABOR IS WHAT DEFINES HUMAN NATURE
- LABOR IS WHAT MEDIATES HUMANS AND NATURE
- HUMANS CREATE THEMSELVES BY DEFINING THEIR NEEDS AND FULFILLING THEM
IN DIRECT INTERACTION (LABOR) ON NATURE
- HUMAN HISTORY DEVELOPS THROUGH STAGES
- EACH STAGE DEVELOPS THROUGH INTERNAL DYNAMICS OF IT'S OWN
(CONTRADICTIONS) (ST. SIMON)
- CAN ONLY REALLY BE DISCOVERED AFTER THE FACT (HISTORICAL METHOD)
- THERE ARE NO GOALS IN HISTORY, NO MASTER PLAN
"HISTORY IS NOTHING BUT THE SUCCESSION OF THE
SEPARATE GENERATIONS, EACH OF WHICH EXPLOITS THE
MATERIALS, THE CAPITAL FUNDS, THE PRODUCTIVE FORCES
HANDED DOWN TO IT BY ALL PRECEDING GENERATIONS, AND
THUS, ON THE ONE HAND, CONTINUES THE TRADITIONAL
ACTIVITY IN COMPLETELY CHANGED CIRCUMSTANCES AND, ON
THE OTHER, MODIFIES THE OLD CIRCUMSTANCES WITH A
COMPLETELY CHANGED ACTIVITY."
THE EIGHTEENTH BRUMAIRE OF LOUIS BONAPARTE (1852)
- STAGES ARE BASED ON THE NOTION OF THE
DIVISION OF LABOR (NOT KNOWLEDGE
SYSTEMS)
- DIVISION OF LABOR LEADS TO DEVELOPMENT
OF CLASS SOCIETY WHICH LEADS TO
ALIENATION AND PRIVATE PROPERTY
- PRE-CLASS SYSTEMS
- MINIMAL DIVISION OF LABOR
- COMMUNAL PROPERTY
- LITTLE SURPLUS
- LITTLE RELIANCE ON EXCHANGE
- WHY WOULD THIS SOCIETY DECLINE?
- CREATION OF SURPLUS
- MORE COMPLICATED DIVISION OF LABOR
- MORE PRODUCTION FOR EXCHANGE
- MORE STABILITY
- FURTHER CHANGES COME FROM INCREASE
IN POPULATION, CONTACT WITH OTHER
GROUPS, CONFLICT, AND SLAVERY
- EXCHANGE DEVELOPS MORE DUE TO
GEOGRAPHICAL SPECIALTIES LEADING TO THE
RISE IN THE USE OF MONEY
- GROWTH OF CITIES AND THE ENSUING
OPPOSITION IS A INDICATOR OF THE
GROWING COMPLEXITY OF THE DIVISION OF
LABOR
- ANCIENT WORLD
- A. TRIBES COMBINE INTO CITIES
- B. AGGRESSIVE AND WARRING
- C. MILITARY, AND EXPANSIONIST
- D. MARX CONCENTRATES ON ROME
- EXPANDING DIVISION OF LABOR
- CONCENTRATION OF WEALTH
- EXPANSION OF SLAVERY AND DESTRUCTION
OF PEASANT, WHY?
- WEALTH BASED ON LANDED PROPERTY,
PRESSURE FOR EXPANSION
- THE SYSTEM FALLS APART BECAUSE OF THE
LACK OF DEVELOPED COMMERCE, THE
RELIANCE ON AGRICULTURE AND SLAVERY. AS
SLAVERY IS DECLINING SMALL SCALE FARMING
EMERGES. THEN COMES THE BARBARIANS
- FEUDALISM
- A. DECLINE OF ANCIENT SOCIETY BROUGHT
FEUDALISM; DIDN'T HAVE TO HAVE FEUDALISM,
- B. COMBINATION OF BARBARIAN AND ROMAN
STRUCTURES
- MILITARY RULE LEADING TO MONARCHY
- SMALL SCALE FARMING WITH PEASANTS
- C. 9TH CENTURY SERFDOM
STRONG GERMANIC TRADITIONS
- COLLECTIVISTIC SOCIAL ORGANIZATION;
- COMMUNAL PROPERTY
- SMALL TOWNS (TUNS)
- D. LITTLE ALIENATION
WORKERS TIED CLOSELY TO THE MEANS OF
PRODUCTION
- E. DECLINE OF FEUDALISM AND THE RISE OF
CAPITALISM, EXPROPRIATING THE MEANS OF
PRODUCTION
- GROWTH OF TOWNS DUE TO MERCANTILE
INTERESTS, 12TH CENTURY
- SERFDOM BASICALLY GONE BY 14TH CENTURY
- ENCLOSURE; INCREASED POVERTY; CREATION
OF FREE LABOR; LAWS OF VAGRANCY;
- FINAL PIECE, GEOGRAPHICAL DISCOVERIES
- F. NEW CITIES (INDUSTRIAL NURSERIES) BECOME
TRADING CENTERS RATHER THAN THE OLD
CORPORATE TOWN
III. CLASS AND CLASS STRUGGLE
- A. CLASS IS DEFINED IN RELATIONSHIP TO THE
MEANS OF PRODUCTION
- B. JOHN STUART MILLS (WEBER WILL SAY MUCH THE
SAME) DISTRIBUTION
IMPLIES INEQUALITIES CAN BE EASILY DEALT
WITH
- C. TENDENCY TOWARDS TWO CLASS SYSTEM,
ESPECIALLY CAPITALISM
- D. CLASSES ARE ALWAYS IN CONFLICT WITH ONE ANOTHER
MANIFESTO OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY (PG. 30-34)
- E. THE CLASS STRUCTURE OF CAPITALISM
- BOURGEOISIE
- A. PETTY-BOURGEOISIE
- B. STRATA
- PROLETARIAT
- LUMPEN-PROLETARIAT
- CRIMINALS
- UNEMPLOYED
- SURPLUS LABOR POOL
- LANDOWNERS
- REMAINING CLASSES
- F. DEVELOPMENT OF CLASS CONSCIOUSNESS
- BOURGEOIS, IDEOLOGY
- PROLETARIAT, REVOLUTIONARY
IV. THEORY OF SURPLUS VALUE
- MOST BASIC FACT OF CAPITALISM IS COMMODITY PRODUCTION!
WHAT MAKES A COMMODITY VALUABLE?
- USE VALUE
- EXCHANGE VALUE
ONLY HAS MEANING IN RELATION TO MARKET
- WHERE DOES EXCHANGE VALUE COME FROM?
- LABOR THEORY OF VALUE
- ABSTRACT GENERAL LABOR
- LABOR POWER
- CONCRETE USEFUL LABOR
- SOCIALLY NECESSARY LABOR
NOT INDIVIDUAL LABOR
- FETISHISM OF COMMODITIES
LIFE OF THEIR OWN, DON'T SEE HUMAN LABOR IN
THEM, BECOME REIFIED AND TAKE ON HUMAN
CHARACTERISTICS (ANTHROPOMORTHIZED)
- CREATION OF SURPLUS VALUE
- BUYS AT VALUE
- SELLS AT VALUE
- MUST GENERATE MORE VALUE
- SIMPLE EXCHANGE PROCESS WOULD BE:
COMMODITY-MONEY-COMMODITY
C-M-C
- IN CAPITALISM
M-C-M
- DRIVING MOTIVE IS PROFIT
MUST BE M-C-M'
- M' EQUALS SURPLUS VALUE (POINT 3 ABOVE)
- WHERE DOES M' COME FROM AND HOW DOES ONE FIGURE THE RATE OF SURPLUS VALUE?
- KEY TO THE ANSWER
LABOR BECOMES A COMMODITY LIKE EVERY OTHER COMMODITY
- CONSTANT CAPITAL
- FIXED CAPITAL
- MACHINES
- RAW RESOURCES
ETC.
- VARIABLE CAPITAL
LABOR COST
- ORGANIC COMPOSITION OF CAPITAL
- RATE OF SURPLUS VALUE
S/V
- RATE OF PROFIT
P=S/C+V
VARIATIONS WITHIN INDUSTRIES
BUT CAPITALISM RESTS ON THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF
CAPITAL DIVIDED INTO THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF SURPLUS
VALUE
V. CONTRADICTIONS OF CAPITALIST PRODUCTION
- A. LAW OF THE FALLING TENDENCY OF THE RATE OF
PROFIT
- AS ORGANIC COMPOSITION OF CAPITAL
INCREASES, THE RATE OF PROFIT DECREASES
- MANY THINGS CAN OFFSET THIS TENDENCY
- B. EMISERATION AND PAUPERISATION
- A LARGER GAP BETWEEN WEALTH OF OWNERS
AND INCOME OF WORKERS
- INCREASED POVERTY
- C. CONCENTRATION AND CENTRALIZATION
- NEW CAPITAL COMING UNDER CONTROL OF A
FEW
- ALREADY EXISTING CAPITAL COMING UNDER
CONTROL OF A FEW
VI. THE NEW SOCIETY
NO CLEAR PLAN, WHY?
- DEPENDS ON WHAT DEVELOPS IN CAPITALISM
- ONE SYSTEM MATURES IN THE NEXT, THIS IS
IMPOSSIBLE TO SEE
- BEST WE CAN DO IS LOOK AT DICTATORSHIP OF THE
PROLETARIATE
- AND SOME IDEALISTIC STATEMENTS
Return to the Development of Sociological Theory Page.
Return to John Hamlin's Home Page.
This page is maintained by John Hamlin (jhamlin@mail.d.umn.edu)
Last modified on Thu Feb 29