Peer Editing Guidelines for Assignment Two
Literary Analysis

Please spend 50 minutes reviewing your classmate's paper according to the following guidelines. If you finish early, do not stop editing. Take the extra time to go back over your comments and make sure they are clear. This may require you to add more comments and add emphasis to comments you have already made. In addition, discuss peer-editing comments with your classmate.

1. Approach—Does this paper satisfy the demands of the assignment? What is the most innovative aspect of the paper? What is the most memorable thing about this paper?

2. Thesis—Indicate the paper's thesis statement. Is it arguable? Could another writer reasonably argue the opposite of this thesis statement? What does the writer tell you about this text that you would not otherwise have considered after reading through the text only once? Does the thesis statement prevent this paper from being a mere summary of the text? 3. Writing Style—Indicate any unclear sentences or any particularly effective sentences. Watch out for uses of the passive voice or excessively wordy sentences. Overall, what are the strengths and weaknesses of this paper's writing style? Are the sentences too complicated and hard to follow, or are they too simple and slow-paced, or do they strike a good balance between these two tendencies?

3. Organization—Provide a brief outline of your classmate's paper. If there is anything about the paper's organization that is unclear, explain to your classmate how she or he can make it clearer. Examine the transitions the writer makes from one paragraph to the next and from one point to another. Consider paragraph lengths. Do the paragraphs tend to be too short (thus making the paper choppy and fragmented)? Or, are the paragraphs too long (thus leading readers to get lost in the flow of ideas)?

4. Evidence—Pay careful attention to your classmate's use of evidence in support of the argument. Indicate any statements that lack support from a quotation though they need such support. Also, indicate any quotation that does not receive enough analysis to make its inclusion in the argument worthwhile. It is rarely a good idea to begin or end a paragraph with a quotation. The writer should introduce the quotation and follow the quotation with an analysis (or explication). Remember that each paper should include a Works Cited list at the end and page numbers for any quotation or paraphrase included in the body of the paper.

5. Opening and Closing Paragraphs—After reading the opening paragraph, explain what compels you to read the paper further. If nothing compels you to do so, suggest ways to change this paragraph to make it more engaging. The closing paragraph should reconsider the overall argument and draw conclusions as a result of that argument. What does this paper's closing paragraph conclude? How might the writer make this conclusion clearer?

6. Questions?Write three questions you have about the paper that will help your classmate develop the argument further.

7. Sign your classmate's draft after you have peer-edited it.

Please turn in one peer-edited draft of your paper along with the final draft. When I grade the final draft, I expect some revisions in response to peer-editing comments, though nothing obligates you to follow all of your peer editor's advice, of course. Remember also that the final draft should be at least six (6) pages long. I will look over peer-editing comments and give you peer editor credit for them when I grade the final drafts. It is crucial that you turn in any edited working drafts along with the final draft of this paper. Otherwise, I cannot give your peer editor credit for the work that he or she has done on your paper.