"I Say"
Assignment Guidelines

Due Dates: Requirements:
Annotated Bibliography—October 24th, 2017
Proposal—November 2nd, 2017
Working Draft—November 14th, 2017
Final Draft—November 28th, 2017
Presentations—November 28th-December 7th, 2017
  • Make your own argument
  • 4-5 pages
  • APA format

Objective

Develop an argument that adopts a clear position on a topic of interest to you and finds support in previously published works on that topic.

NOTE: We are going to use Google Docs to share and turn in this assignment. If, for some reason, our trial runs produce unresolvable problems, I may switch back to hard-copy submission and document-sharing.

Procedure

  1. Choose a new They Say / I Say topic area—different from the one in your previous paper. Select 1-2 articles in They Say / I Say that you find particularly engaging. Use library resources to research 3-4 additional works outside of They Say I Say that address this new topic area, for a minimum of five sources.

  2. Take notes identifying aspects of this topic area that make it particularly appealing or thought-provoking. Which information will be of the greatest interest to an audience consisting of your fellow students at UMD?

  3. Write an Annotated Bibliography listing five sources in accordance with APA format, followed by brief summary and evaluative statement (~120 words). Share this with me at "jschwetm@d.umn.edu" as a Google Doc on October 24th, 2017.

  4. Formulate an outline consisting of a thesis statement and three to four subtopics backing this thesis up, and bring this to class on November 2nd, 2017.

  5. Write a working draft of at least 4 pages, and share it with peer reviewers as a Google Doc on November 14th, 2017, for peer-review in accordance with peer-review guidelines.

  6. Revise this draft with the help of peer-review feedback, and share the final draft with me as directed on November 28th, 2017. Share your peer-reviewed draft in addition to your final draft.

  7. Present your argument with the help of visual aids and in accordance with presentation assignment guidelines below.

Annotated Bibliography (5 sources) — 10 points

List five sources in accordance with APA format. Follow each entry with a concise summary of the source (~100 words) and an evaluative statement explaining how helpful it will be to you and why it will be helpful. Share this with me (jschwetm@d.umn.edu) as a Google Doc by the end of the day on October 24th, 2017.

Proposal (300-500 words) — 5 points

Write an outline of a paper that addresses your topic according the following model:

THESIS STATEMENT: One sentence putting forward an arguable claim pertaining to one of the five topic areas. Make an argument about a course of action like you did for the op-ed assignment.

  1. Sub-topic related to the thesis statement.

  2. Sub-topic related to the thesis statement.

  3. Sub-topic related to the thesis statement.

Bring a hard copy of this to class on November 2nd, 2017, and share it with me as Google Doc by the end of the day.

Working draft (4-5 pages) — 10 points

Re-work the outline into an essay that elaborates and add quotations and paraphrases from your sources to support your claims. Make an argument and, at some point in your paper, include a naysayer argument along with your refutation of it. Include APA-formatted in-text references and a list of References at the end. Introduce your argument with some claims about the importance of the chosen topic, and conclude with a brief review of what you have argued and concluding thoughts about how readers might use this information.

Share this draft with peer reviewers as a Google Doc by November 14th, 2017 so they can provide you with feedback in accordance with peer-review guidelines.

Final draft — 60 points

Revise your working draft in response to feedback you receive from peer-reviewers and from me at the one-on-one conference.

Grading standards

I will base your paper grade on the following criteria:

  1. Clarity and focus of an arguable stance on your topic.
  2. Appropriate support of claims in the essay, especially the use of direct quotations from supporting sources.
  3. A coherent approach to a specific audience, including acknowledgment of possible counterarguments.
  4. Effective organization of the argument, sign-posted with clear topic sentences, transitional expressions and keywords.
  5. Adequate documentation of sources in accordance with the APA format.
  6. A command of Edited Standard Written English demonstrating that the writer has carefully revised and proofread to remove grammatical and spelling errors.
  7. Page design and layout, including an APA-formatted list of References at the end.

Presentation — 15 points

Individually, or in groups of up to 4 people, present your topic to the rest of class in a presentation lasting 5 minutes per speaker and in which each group members speaks for five minutes minimum. Support this presentation with visual aids of some sort—a poster, a Power Point or Prezi production, or some other creative means of supplementing your argument with visuals.

Each presentation will conclude with a question-and-answer session. Students should definitely plan to pose questions in response to what they hear.

I will score your presentations based on the following criteria:

  1. Clarity and focus, again. Make a clear argument.
  2. Appropriateness of support for claims. A minimum of two outside sources in this presentation.
  3. How well this presentation engages with an audience of your classmates.
  4. Organization of ideas.
  5. Effectiveness of visual aids, including layout.
  6. Speaking style.