Art Course Evaluations

Course :


Other (if not in list above)
With which class will you graduate?
Home or present University/School:
Are you a major in this department?

A- Quality and depth of Presentation - Were the material, www resources, subjects/topics interestingly presented? All, as presented, was:
12 3 4 5 Not applicable
(boring) . . . . . . . . (engaging)

B-
Shared time- Was the class time necessary for an understanding of the subject, or could it be missed without loss? Classtime was:
12 3 4 5 Not applicable
(worthless) . . . . . . . . (invaluable)

C- Studio - Were the studios helpful? Context was:
12 3 4 5 Not applicable
(a nuisance) . . . . . . . . (helpful)

D- Course Material - Was the reading material (including text) and/or computer, slides or videos valuable? Material was:
12 3 4 5 Not applicable
(worthless) . . . . . . . . (invaluable)

E- Tests and/or WWW Research Interdisciplinary Project Paper
Test and research papers as a learning experience. Both were:
12 3 4 5 Not applicable
(punitive) . . . . . . . . (very helpful)

F- Tests and research papers covered the material from all the class resources:
12 3 4 5 Not applicable
(poorly) . . . . . . . . (well)

G- Tests and research paper comments were:
12 3 4 5 Not applicable
(unhelpful) . . . . . . . . (very helpful)

H- Fairness of Grading - Would you consider the grading of tests and papers fair or arbitrary? Please try to be objective. Grading was:
12 3 4 5 Not applicable
(arbitrary) . . . . . . . . (fair)

I- Workload - Compared to other courses you have taken, how would you rate the amount of work demanded? The workload was:
12 3 4 5 Not applicable
(light) . . . . . . . . (heavy)

J- Hours of outside of class work and research:
0-22-5 5-8 8-12 12+

K- Accessibility of the instructor - Was it easy to see the instructor outside of class? The instructor was:
12 3 4 5 Not applicable (I never tried)
(inaccessible) . . . . . . . . (very accessible)

L- Educational content - Was the content of the course as worthwhile as you had hoped? The course was:
12 3 4 5 Not applicable
(a waste of time) . . . . . . . . (worthwhile)

M- Recommendation - Would you recommend this course?
12 3 4 5 Not applicable
(not at all) . . . . . . . . (very highly)

N- Recommendation - Would you take, TA or RA the prospective course?
12 3 4 5 No I would not
(not at all) . . . .(somewhat interested) . . . . (very likely)

Please write your comments or feedback about a course or the prospective course, and/or instructor below:

class evaluations

Copy and paste to lbrush@bulldog3.d.umn.edu

 

June, 1998

to personal page

to Art Today page

to top of this page

to Three Dimensional Studies

to I ask you index page

 

 

 

 

 

"The views and opinions expressed in this page are stricly those of the page author. The contents of this page have not been approved by the University of Minnesota."