| Lynn Bye, M.S.W., Ph.D., LISW | Office: Bohannon Hall 218 |
| Assistant Professor | Phone: (218) 726-8492 |
| Email: lbye@d.umn.edu | Office hours: Thursday 10:00-11:00 a.m. I am happy to see you at other times during the week by appointment. |
This course will provide you with a framework for analyzing and intervening with social problems at the mezzo and macro levels. You will learn how to identify critical issues using the problem-solving approach. The course involves intensive exposure to specific strategies and tactics for organizing and advocacy at community, regional, state and national levels. Community-organizing methods of shaping community development, social policy, and social planning will be addressed. Throughout this course the concept of community is developed within the ecological perspective which relates to various social system levels. Specific interventions are based on problem-solving and other generic skills learned in the foundation year or in undergraduate social work programs.
In keeping with the advanced generalist model of social work practice, organizational theory and management practices are presented within the social work practice; organizational theory and management practices are presented within the social systems theory context and with a problem-solving/planning focus. It is particularly important that students know how to apply the problem-solving model at all three levels of intervention for their field placements and for subsequent employment. Attention is paid to the core functions of administration. Other topics will include ethical dilemmas in the administration of human services agencies, program development, and management of diversity in the workplace.
When it comes to oppressive systems people working together can be a powerful force for change. Advanced generalist social workers need to be able to initiate change by rallying others to take action to eliminate societal conditions that damage the welfare and dignity of people. This course will explore policies and ideologies that help keep the most vulnerable people in society oppressed and will help prepare you for macro-level intervention with diverse populations within the advanced generalist model.
At the end of the course, the student should be able to:
Students will gain skills in:
Cross,
R. (2002). Making the invisible work visible: Using social network analysis
to
support strategic collaboration. California Management Review,
44(2), pp. 25-46.
Cross. R., & Prusak, L. (2002). The people who make organizations go--or
stop.
Harvard Business Review, June, pp. 105-112.
Cross. T. L., Bazron, B.J., Dennis, K.W., & Isaacs, M.R. (1989). Towards a culturally competent system of care volume 1: A monograph on effective services for minority children who are severely emotionally disturbed. Washington, D.C. CASSP Technical Assistance Center, Georgetown University Child Development Center. (Chapter II, pp. 13-39)
Hummel,
J.M. (1996). Starting and running a non-profit organization (2nd ed.).
Minneapolis, MN: University
of Minnesota
Press.
Kahn, Si, (1991). Organizing: A guide for grassroots leaders (revised
ed.).
Washington, DC: NASW.
Manning,
S.S. ( 2003). Ethical leadership in human services – A multi-dimensional
approach.
Boston:
Pearson Education, Inc. (
Course reading: Chapter 2 and Chapter 9).
Mor
Barak, M. (2000). Beyond affirmative action: Toward a model of diversity
and
organizational inclusion. Administration in
Social Work, 23(3/4), 47-68.
Peacock, T. & Wisuri, M. (2002). Ojibwe waasa inaabidaa: We look
in all
directions. Afton, MN: Afton Historical Society.
Rothman, J. (1995). Approaches to community intervention. In J. Rothman, J.
Erlich & J. Tropman (Eds.), Strategies of
community intervention: Macro
practice (5th Eds.). Itasca, IL: Peacock, pp26-63.
Kahn, S. (1994). How people get power (rev. ed.). Washington, D.C.:
National Association of Social Workers.
Nair, K. (1994). A higher standard of leadership: Lessons from the life
of Gandhi.
San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Gil
de Gibaja, M. (2001). An exploratory study of administrative practice in collaboratives.
Administration in Social Work, 25(2), 39-59.
Hyde,
C. (2000). The hybrid non-profit: An examination of feminist social movement
organizations. Journal of Community Practice, 8(4), 45-67.
Mizrahi,
T., & Rosenthal, B. B. (2001). Complexities of coalition building: Leaders'
successes,
strategies, struggles, and solutions. Social Work, 46(1),
63-78.
Simms,
M. (2000). Impressions of leadership through a native woman's eyes.
Urban
Education, 35(5), 637-644.
Thompson,
J., & Marley, M. (1999). Women in human services management: Continued
issues
and concerns. Administration in Social Work, 23(2), 17-31.
You will be placed in groups of three for reflections. Every other week during the semester you will be required to post in Web-X (in your group of three) a one-page written reflection about the readings for that week. On alternate weeks you will need to post thoughtful and reflective responses to the papers posted the previous week. To receive credit you must post your papers and responses before class begins each week. The written reflections will be graded using Henri's (1992) criteria for evaluating critical thinking which includes the following: relevance, importance, novelty, bringing in outside knowledge or experience, justification, critical assessment, linking ideas or interpretations, clarity, practical utility, and breadth of understanding. According to Henri (1992) surface level information processing involves simply repeating something without adding new information, making statements without justification, or giving suggestions without explanation. In-depth processing involves bringing new information, showing links, proposing solutions with an analysis of possible consequences, and evidence of justification.
Starting in the fall of 2005 the UMD Social Work Department moved to a Portfolio system. Please see the following web site for more information on the use of portfolios in your social work education http://www.d.umn.edu/sw/portfolio/overview.htm
There are two group projects in this course (which are described below) that could be used in your portfolio: 1) Organizational Assessment, and 2) Community Organizational Project. This is a practice course that focuses on social work within organizations and communities. A central part of this type of social work practice involves working with others to accomplish tasks that will enhance the lives of people in the community. Social work administrators and community organizers must learn to interact effectively with others to achieve organizational and community goals. The ability to work well in groups and team with others is critical. As an administrator or community organizer you need skills in working cooperatively and facilitating small and large group decision making. This course is designed to provide you with hands-on experience collaborating with others.
For this assignment you will need to find an organization in the community where you can conduct an assessment of an organization's cultural competence. The paper should be written in narrative form and be about eight double-spaced pages. Graduate-level quality of writing skill is expected and graded. The final project must cite class readings which are relevant to each unit of the project and follow APA format. Your organizational assessment should use Terry Cross's typology and the following Organizational Assessment of Cultural Competence found at http://www.aucd.org/councils/multicultural/Cultural_Competence_Survey.htm to assess the organization. Discuss your findings of the strengths, areas for improvement, and suggestions that you may have for the organization.
This project is designed to allow you to demonstrate a professional use of self. Class members will be involved for at least 15 hours outside of class during the semester in an organization in the community. This semester options for outside projects involve the following:
1) The staff at Patch, a local non-profit agency, have requested help on projects in the community. Students in the class will be divided into groups to work on these projects. Patch is located at 1406 East 2nd Street, Suite B, Duluth, MN., phone 218-728-4287. Patch staff members, Cindy Donner and Dawn Hurst, will be working with us throughout the semester and will attend our second class session . They will explain the projects that Patch needs assistance with at this time.
2) The staff at Community Action Duluth, another local non-profit agency, have also requested help with projects. Saff from this agency, Stan Kiefers, Sonia Bonialla and Jennifer Pigeon will also attend our second class session to share information about opportunities to work with them. Community Action Duluth is located at 19 North 21 Ave. West, phone 218-726-1665.
The organizational project will include the following activities:
The papers should demonstrate an application of what you learned in the readings and activities for this class. Be sure to cite the literature and clearly describe how you have applied it. You need to cite a minimum of six books or professional journal articles.
This assignment includes completion of a Project Meeting Peer Evaluation Form. The form can be found at the end of this syllabus and is intended to help you document the 15 hours required outside of class time for the project. It also provides a way to reflect on the plan you develop and the group process. The form is due the last class period of each month.
Each group will be required to give a 20-minute presentation of the final analysis of their community project. These presentations should encompass the following elements and will be graded accordingly:
All written assignments should be typed, double-spaced, have a one-inch margin and be printed in a 12-point font. They are to have page numbers and be stapled together. Check your papers for errors in spelling and grammar. Be sure to cite your text and the other readings in the body of your paper using the American Psychological Association (APA) format. For example, you only need a page number for a direct quote; you need to put the last name of the author and the year published for all citations (see below). There are several other features of APA format that you need to look up in the most recent edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. Also, include a complete list of references and again check the correct APA format.
There are two different ways of citing sources in papers when you do not use a direct quote.
The literature on service learning and social work education addresses recreational services for elementary school students (Butcher & Hall, 1998), housing for the homeless (Forte, 1997), and companionship for the elderly (Dorfman, Murty, Imgram, & Evans, 2002; Hegman, Horowitz, Tepper, Pillemer & Schultz, 2002).
Lowes (1998) agrees with Epstein that patient-centered care involves developing an agreement with the patient about the nature of the problem.
The following is an example of one way to cite a source when you use a direct quote.
Characteristics of service learning include learning academic course content through service in the community and "civic learning" that prepare students for "community or public involvement in a diverse democratic society" (Howard, 2001, p. 38).
Please note that in the above example the page number is included.
The following are examples of how to reference a book in the reference section of your paper.
Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives. White Plains, NY: Longman Inc.
Example 2
Example of a reference from an edited book
Liu, G. (1995). What National and community service means for higher education.
In J. Galura & J. Holward's (Eds.) Praxis III: Voices in dialogue
(pp. 9-15). Ann Arbor, Michigan: OCSL Press.
Mabry, J.B. (1998). Pedagogical variations in service-learning and student outcomes: How time, contact and reflection matter. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 5(3), 32-47.
A good source for APA help is: http://www.docstyles.com/apacrib.htm
The majority of your paper should be written in your own words. Quotes may be used as long as they are cited but your paper should not consist of one quote after another. You need to lead into quotes with your own words. Do not put a quote in your paper without explaining the point you are trying to make in your own words. Whenever you use another person's idea, you must give that person credit by citing him or her.
All good papers have an introduction, a middle section, and a summary. Be sure to include an introductory paragraph in your paper that captures the reader's attention and explains what will follow in the rest of the paper. Each paragraph should start with a topic sentence which is a general statement supported with information in the following sentences in the paragraph. Typically, there should be a minimum of two sentences for a paragraph. You need transitions between paragraphs and between sentences so that they flow logically. Support your assertions with evidence from the literature. The summary section of your paper should touch on the main points you want the reader to remember. It is not a good idea to introduce new information in the summary. Also, in a formal paper it is best to write words out rather than using use contractions such as "can't."
To catch errors, I strongly suggest that you read your paper out loud. Also, it is a very good idea to have someone else read your paper to give you critical feedback that you can use on your final draft.
The instructor is willing to read first drafts of papers and give feedback up to (but not after) five days before the due date. Late papers are not accepted unless special arrangements have been made with the instructor. Requests for an extension on papers must be submitted in writing at least five days before the assignment is due.
Written reports will be graded according to the following:
| Depth and quality of the research | 25% |
| Adequacy of bibliography and appropriate use of citations | 5% |
| Discussion of implications of the information obtained | 25% |
| Conceptual clarity of the thesis, body and conclusion | 25% |
| Organization of paper (heading, transitions, etc.) | 10% |
| Grammar, spelling, sentence structure and punctuation | 5% |
| APA format | 5% |
The following site covers a multitude of writing issues - grammar, style, genre:
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/general/index.html
The following two sites give examples of APA Style for the body of your paper as well as for the bib or reference list.
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/research/r_apa.html#Handling%20Quotes%20In%20Your%20Text
http://www.apastyle.org/
The UMD Social Work Department has writing consultants available to help students who want to improve their writing skills in relationship to their course assignments. If you are interested in getting help, discuss this with one of your course instructors. If your instructor feels that you could benefit from professional writing consultation, he or she will refer you to him.
My highest priority is for our classroom and
course work to facilitate participation and exchange. I am eager to make accommodations
to
guarantee to students with disabilities access to class sessions, course materials,
and the activities of the class. You are encouraged
to contact the Access Center-Disability Services to discuss and arrange reasonable
accommodations (102 Kirby Center, tel. 726-8217). In
addition, please let me know as soon as possible if you have a disability for
which accommodations will be requested. Note that you
are under no obligation to disclose the nature of your disability to me or other
faculty.
We can assume that discrimination exists in many forms (e.g. sexism, racism, classism, ageism, homophobia, anti-Semitism, ableism, etc.). Any critical understanding of these various "isms" means that we need to recognize that we have been taught misinformation about our own group as well as about members of other groups. This is true for dominant (e.g., white, male, upper class, heterosexual, able-bodied, etc.) and subordinated (e.g., people of color, women, poor, working class, gay/lesbian, disabled, Jew, etc.) group members. Based on these assumptions, then, let us agree that we cannot be blamed for misinformation we have learned, but we will be held accountable for repeating information after we have learned otherwise. People and groups are not to be blamed for their subordinate positions. Let us assume that people are always doing the best they can. Let us actively pursue information about our own groups and those of others. Let us share information about our own group with other members of the class but never demean, devalue, or in any other way put down people for their own experiences. We each have an obligation to actively combat myths and stereotypes about our own groups so that we can break down the walls which prohibit group cooperation and group gain. Let us create a safe environment for open discussion.
Class participation is important because the exchange of ideas is necessary in the quest for knowledge. Active class participation facilitates learning not only for the individual participating but for the other class members as well. In order to obtain full credit for participation students need to attend all classes. Students who miss more than three classes will fail the course. Each class period a sign-in sheet will be passed around. It is your responsibility to sign this attendance sheet. Students who are not signed in will not earn any class participation points for that session.
Developing the ability to participate in a group discussion is essential in the social work field. In class students are expected at all times to demonstrate courteous listening skills. In other words, when someone is speaking, others are quiet and attentive.
A = Excellent Participation includes frequent and appropriate contributions which:
B = Regular contributions that are not so integrative or interpretive such as:
C = Little contribution such as:
D = Minimal participation such as:
F = No participation.
| Learning Product | Date Due | Percent of Grade |
| Reflection Papers | weekly | 15 |
| Class Participation | weekly | 15 |
| Peer Evaluation | monthly | 5 |
| Organizational Assessment | first week of November | 20 |
| Community Project Paper | Last week of semester | 20 |
| Presentation of Community Project | Last two weeks of semester | 10 |
| Three presentations on progress/learning from community project | monthly | 15 |
| Class | Date | Theme & Activity | Assignment |
| 1 | 9-6 | History of community organizing Definitions of / differences between organizational types What can go wrong in a group project? Pre-test |
Reading: Syllabus Assignment: For next class period look up the mission statement for Patch, Community Action Duluth, Clean Water Action and the NAACP |
| 2 | 9-13 | Potential community projects Developing a mission statement Speakers:
Form groups for two projects |
Reading: Hummel, pages 1-50 |
| 3 | 9-20 | Tribal community organization |
Reading: Peacock & Wissuri, Ojibwe Waasa Inaabidaa: We Look In All Directions, pages 1-159. (This is a beautifully written book with many photos and pictures) |
| 4 | 9-27 | Structure and funding of organizations:
|
Reading: Hummel, Starting and Running a Nonprofit Organization, pages 51-144 Assignment for next class: Go to the PAVSA website and read about the mission and structure of this non-profit organization PAVSA: Program for Aid to Victims of Sexual Assault Turn in: Peer Evaluation Form |
| 5 | 10-4 | Policies and procedures, bylaws, liability, working with boards Types of boards and liability of board members Speaker:
|
Reading: Kahn, Organizing: A Guide for Grassroots Leaders, pages 1-112 PAVSA bylaws and board member responsibilities
|
| 6 | 10-11 | Core functions of administration; theories of management:
Network analysis Assessing organizations and communities (SWAT exercise) |
Reading: Cross, Making the Invisible Work Visable, pages 25-46 Cross & Prusak, The People Who Make Organizations Go--or Stop, pages 105-112
Handout: Characteristics of a Bureaucracy Meet at Patch located at 1406 East Second Street, Suite B Try to carpool if you can |
| 7 | 10-18 | You are expected to attend sessions at the St. Louis County Conference this week for class | I suggest you attend one of the following sessions:
|
| 8 | 10-25 | Supervision, hiring, evaluation, motivation
|
Reading: Mor Barak, Beyond Affirmative Action: Toward a Model of Diversity and Organizational Inclusion, pages 47-68 Handouts: Legal Interviewing Interview Questions to Ask The Americans with Disabilities Act: A Primmer An Employer's Guide to Employment Law Who is protected and how? Turn in: Peer Evaluation Form |
| 9 | 11-1 |
Organizational cultural competence.
Speaker: John Day |
Reading: Kahn, Organizing: A Guide for Grassroots Leaders, pages 113-204
Handouts: Organizational Elements of Cultural Competence Organizational Assessment of Cultural Competence located at http://www.aucd.org/councils/multicultural/ Cultural_Competence_Survey.htm |
| 10 | 11-8 | What motivates people Gandhian principles, social work values and ethics Speaker: Cathryn Curley, Safe Haven Shelter |
Reading: Manning, Ethical Leadership in Human Services, Chapters 2 & 9 Handouts: Properly Conducted Performance Reviews Pay... Sever Employee Ties the Right Way... Thirteen Reasons People Don't Do What They're ... |
| 11 | 11-15 | Mobilizing an entire community Models of community intervention Video: Not in Our Town II. (54 minutes) VC 3555 |
Rothman, Approaches to Community Intervention, pages 26-63.
Turn in: Organizational Assessment |
| 12 | 11-22 | Power, oppression and strategies of change: Martin Luther King Black Panthers Women's movement Activity: Star Power |
Kahn, Organizing: A Guide for Grassroots Leaders, pages 261-288 No written reflection due |
| 13 | 11-29 | Asset-based community development Management tasks and effectiveness, leadership
Video: Toxic Racism. (60 minutes) VC2443 pt. 2 |
Reading: Kretzmann & Mcknight, pages 345-354 Turn in: Peer Evaluation Form |
| 14 | 12-6 | Student Presentations | Presentation on Community Projects No written reflection due |
| 15 | 12-13 | Student Presentations | Presentation on Community Projects Turn in: Community Project Papers No written reflection due |
GROUP PROJECT PEER EVALUATION --COMMUNITY PROJECT Adapted from a form created by Patricia Merrier, UMD Finance and Management Information Sciences |
|||||
| Circle the number that represents your rating of the group members on each criterion; use 1 as low and 5 as high. | |||||
| Month | |||||
| Member's Name --> | Self-rating |
||||
| Provided valuable input during planning | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Actively participated in group discussions | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Assumed fair share of responsibility for project | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Attended group meetings OR had valid reason for not doing so and provided advance notice | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Listened to and respected other's input | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Accepted comments/criticism from other members (did not insist on having his/her way) | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Submitted work that met the quality standard of the group | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Provided quality input (appropriate and relevant information) | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Shared resources appropriately | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Willing to do work outside of the meeting | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Met deadlines for his/her share of the work | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Would you work on a group project with this person again? | yes no | yes no | yes no | yes no | yes no |
| Should this person receive the grade assigned to the written and oral reports? | yes no no- higher no- lower |
yes no
no- higher no- lower |
yes no
no- higher no- lower |
yes no
no- higher no- lower |
yes no
no- higher no- lower |
| Dates of meetings | 1st meeting |
2nd meeting | 2nd meeting | 2nd meeting | 3rd meeting |
Summary describing what happened during the meeting |
|||||
| Evaluation of how well the group is working together | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 | 1 2 3 4 5 |
http://www.nyu.edu/socialwork/wwwrsw/ has been substantially upgraded and currently contains 65,000 links. In the past year they removed approximately 2000 links to lower quality services and have added approximately 7000 new links. The majority of these links are to the literature--full text scientific, technical and policy reports. In addition, this site contains links to 2200 scholarly journals and newsletters, of which, 110 are to sites that provide full text articles. A wide range of links to relevant government agencies, educational institutions and professional organizations are also included. This site is updated daily and has been in operation since 1994.
http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/links/norms-Aug2003.html Standards for transnational corporations with regard to human rights
http://www.goodforminnesota.org/ Information and ideas for action regarding the budget crisis.