SW 8331--Section 001

Organization and Community Practice II

University of Minnesota Duluth

Department of Social Work

Fall Semester 2005

Tuesday 3:00-5:50, Kirby Plaza 312

Lynn Bye, M.S.W., Ph.D., LISW Office: Bohannon Hall 218
Assistant Professor Phone: (218) 726-8492
Email: lbye@d.umn.edu Office hours: Thursday 10:00-11:00 a.m.
I am happy to see you at other times during the week by appointment.

Course Description

This course will provide you with a framework for analyzing and intervening with social problems at the mezzo and macro levels. You will learn how to identify critical issues using the problem-solving approach. The course involves intensive exposure to specific strategies and tactics for organizing and advocacy at community, regional, state and national levels. Community-organizing methods of shaping community development, social policy, and social planning will be addressed. Throughout this course the concept of community is developed within the ecological perspective which relates to various social system levels.  Specific interventions are based on problem-solving and other generic skills learned in the foundation year or in undergraduate social work programs. 

In keeping with the advanced generalist model of social work practice, organizational theory and management practices are presented within the social work practice; organizational theory and management practices are presented within the social systems theory context and with a problem-solving/planning focus.  It is particularly important that students know how to apply the problem-solving model at all three levels of intervention for their field placements and for subsequent employment.  Attention is paid to the core functions of administration. Other topics will include ethical dilemmas in the administration of human services agencies, program development, and management of diversity in the workplace. 

When it comes to oppressive systems people working together can be a powerful force for change.  Advanced generalist social workers need to be able to initiate change by rallying others to take action to eliminate societal conditions that damage the welfare and dignity of people.  This course will explore policies and ideologies that help keep the most vulnerable people in society oppressed and will help prepare you for macro-level intervention with diverse populations within the advanced generalist model.

This course fulfills the following advanced generalist practice program goals 

At the end of the course, the student should be able to:

Course Objectives

  1. Students will apply critical thinking skills in each class session and in their group projects.
  2. Students will practice within the values and ethics of the social work profession with an
    understanding for the positive value of diversity. 
  3. Students will understand the forms and mechanisms of oppression and discrimination and
    the strategies of change that advance social and economic justice.
  4. Students will be able to analyze situations and develop strategies of change in organizations
    and communities that advance social and economic justice. 
  5. Students will be able to explain the dynamics of power: how to get it and how to use it. 
  6. Students will be able to create a non-profit organization.
  7. Students will be able to explain the core functions of human service agencies.
  8. Students will be able to use social network analysis to support strategic collaboration.

Skills

Students will gain skills in:

  1. Using the problem-solving model to identify problems in a community
  2. Using the strengths perspective to conduct asset-based assessment
  3. Turning problems into issues
  4. Identifying bases of power in the community
  5. Facilitating community-based planning
  6. Locating necessary resources
  7. Developing coalitions and organizations
  8. Cultivating support
  9. Gathering and using data
  10. Organizational and community assessment
  11. Demonstrating leadership and leadership development
  12. Facilitating a meeting
  13. Developing strategies for change
  14. Articulating alternative approaches of community organizing including social action,
    social policy, locality development and social planning

RequiredReading

Cross, R. (2002). Making the invisible work visible:  Using social network analysis to
support strategic collaboration. California Management Review, 44(2), pp. 25-46.

Cross. R., & Prusak, L. (2002). The people who make organizations go--or stop. 
Harvard Business Review
, June, pp. 105-112.

Cross. T. L., Bazron, B.J., Dennis, K.W., & Isaacs, M.R. (1989). Towards a culturally competent system of care volume 1: A monograph on effective services for minority children who are severely emotionally disturbed.  Washington, D.C. CASSP Technical Assistance Center, Georgetown University Child Development Center. (Chapter II, pp. 13-39)

Hummel, J.M. (1996). Starting and running a non-profit organization (2nd ed.)
Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Kahn, Si, (1991). Organizing:  A guide for grassroots leaders (revised ed.).
Washington, DC: NASW.

Manning, S.S. ( 2003). Ethical leadership in human services – A multi-dimensional approach. 
Boston: Pearson Education, Inc. (
Course reading: Chapter 2 and Chapter 9).

Mor Barak, M. (2000). Beyond affirmative action: Toward a model of diversity
and organizational inclusion. Administration in
Social Work, 23
(3/4), 47-68.

Peacock, T. & Wisuri, M. (2002).  Ojibwe waasa inaabidaa: We look in all
directions.
Afton, MN: Afton Historical Society.

Rothman, J. (1995). Approaches to community intervention. In J. Rothman, J.
Erlich & J. Tropman (Eds.), Strategies of community intervention: Macro
practice (5th Eds.)
. Itasca, IL: Peacock, pp26-63.

Recommended Reading

Kahn, S. (1994).  How people get power (rev. ed.). Washington, D.C.:
National Association of Social Workers.

Nair, K. (1994).  A higher standard of leadership: Lessons from the life of Gandhi. 
San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. 

Gil de Gibaja, M. (2001). An exploratory study of administrative practice in collaboratives.
Administration in Social Work, 25
(2), 39-59.

Hyde, C. (2000). The hybrid non-profit: An examination of feminist social movement
organizations. Journal of Community Practice, 8(4), 45-67.

Mizrahi, T., & Rosenthal, B. B. (2001). Complexities of coalition building: Leaders' successes,
strategies, struggles, and solutions. Social Work, 46(1), 63-78.

Simms, M. (2000). Impressions of leadership through a native woman's eyes.
Urban Education, 35
(5), 637-644.

Thompson, J., & Marley, M. (1999). Women in human services management: Continued
issues and concerns. Administration in Social Work, 23(2), 17-31.

Description of Assignments

Reflection

You will be placed in groups of three for reflections.  Every other week during the semester you will be required to post in Web-X (in your group of three) a one-page written reflection about the readings for that week. On alternate weeks you will need to post thoughtful and reflective responses to the papers posted the previous week.  To receive credit you must post your papers and responses before class begins each week. The written reflections will be graded using Henri's (1992) criteria for evaluating critical thinking which includes the following: relevance, importance, novelty, bringing in outside knowledge or experience, justification, critical assessment, linking ideas or interpretations, clarity, practical utility, and breadth of understanding.  According to Henri (1992) surface level information processing involves simply repeating something without adding new information, making statements without justification, or giving suggestions without explanation.  In-depth processing involves bringing new information, showing links, proposing solutions with an analysis of possible consequences, and evidence of justification.

Sample reflection paper

Portfolio Projects:

Starting in the fall of 2005 the UMD Social Work Department moved to a Portfolio system.  Please see the following web site for more information on the use of portfolios in your social work education http://www.d.umn.edu/sw/portfolio/overview.htm

There are two group projects in this course (which are described below) that could be used in your portfolio: 1) Organizational Assessment, and 2) Community Organizational Project. This is a practice course that focuses on social work within organizations and communities.  A central part of this type of social work practice involves working with others to accomplish tasks that will enhance the lives of people in the community.  Social work administrators and community organizers must learn to interact effectively with others to achieve organizational and community goals. The ability to work well in groups and team with others is critical. As an administrator or community organizer you need skills in working cooperatively and facilitating small and large group decision making. This course is designed to provide you with hands-on experience collaborating with others.

Organizational Assessment :

For this assignment you will need to find an organization in the community where you can conduct an assessment of an organization's cultural competence. The paper should be written in narrative form and be about eight double-spaced pages.  Graduate-level quality of writing skill is expected and graded.  The final project must cite class readings which are relevant to each unit of the project and follow APA format. Your organizational assessment should use Terry Cross's typology and the following Organizational Assessment of Cultural Competence found at http://www.aucd.org/councils/multicultural/Cultural_Competence_Survey.htm to assess the organization. Discuss your findings of the strengths, areas for improvement, and suggestions that you may have for the organization.

Group Project 2--Community Organizational Project

This project is designed to allow you to demonstrate a professional use of self.  Class members will be involved for at least 15 hours outside of class during the semester in an organization in the community. This semester options for outside projects involve the following:

1) The staff at Patch, a local non-profit agency, have requested help on projects in the community. Students in the class will be divided into groups to work on these projects. Patch is located at 1406 East 2nd Street, Suite B, Duluth, MN., phone 218-728-4287. Patch staff members, Cindy Donner and Dawn Hurst, will be working with us throughout the semester and will attend our second class session . They will explain the projects that Patch needs assistance with at this time.

2) The staff at Community Action Duluth, another local non-profit agency, have also requested help with projects.  Saff from this agency, Stan Kiefers, Sonia Bonialla and Jennifer Pigeon will also attend our second class session to share information about opportunities to work with them. Community Action Duluth is located at 19 North 21 Ave. West, phone 218-726-1665.

The organizational project will include the following activities:

  1. Assist Patch or Community Action Duluth with some activity that is negotiated between you, the organization, and your instructor.
  2. Each student will submit an individual 5-7-page paper by the last class session of the semester describing what was learned from the organizational involvement. In addition, students should describe the organization, utilizing key concepts from class and the text; for example, students should describe the type of organizing model which best fits the agency, the type of leadership and its effect on the organization, the use of the problem-solving model towards the issue the organization is focused on, and the ecological perspective of the organization. The paper should also address the following: 

The papers should demonstrate an application of what you learned in the readings and activities for this class.  Be sure to cite the literature and clearly describe how you have applied it. You need to cite a minimum of six books or professional journal articles.

This assignment includes completion of a Project Meeting Peer Evaluation Form. The form can be found at the end of this syllabus and is intended to help you document the 15 hours required outside of class time for the project. It also provides a way to reflect on the plan you develop and the group process. The form is due the last class period of each month.

Group Presentation of Paper

Each group will be required to give a 20-minute presentation of the final analysis of their community project.  These presentations should encompass the following elements and will be graded accordingly:

Guidelines for ALL Written Assignments

All written assignments should be typed, double-spaced, have a one-inch margin and be printed in a 12-point font.  They are to have page numbers and be stapled together.  Check your papers for errors in spelling and grammar.  Be sure to cite your text and the other readings in the body of your paper using the American Psychological Association (APA) format. For example, you only need a page number for a direct quote; you need to put the last name of the author and the year published for all citations (see below). There are several other features of APA format that you need to look up in the most recent edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association.  Also, include a complete list of references and again check the correct APA format.

APA format

Examples of citations in the text of the book:

There are two different ways of citing sources in papers when you do not use a direct quote.

Example 1

The literature on service learning and social work education addresses recreational services for elementary school students (Butcher & Hall, 1998), housing for the homeless (Forte, 1997), and companionship for the elderly (Dorfman, Murty, Imgram, & Evans, 2002; Hegman, Horowitz, Tepper, Pillemer & Schultz, 2002).

Example 2

Lowes (1998) agrees with Epstein that patient-centered care involves developing an agreement with the patient about the nature of the problem.

Citing Direct Quotes

The following is an example of one way to cite a source when you use a direct quote.

Example 1

Characteristics of service learning include learning academic course content through service in the community and "civic learning" that prepare students for "community or public involvement in a diverse democratic society" (Howard, 2001, p. 38).

Please note that in the above example the page number is included.

Examples of how to do the reference section

The following are examples of how to reference a book in the reference section of your paper.

Example 1

Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives. White Plains, NY: Longman Inc.


Example 2

Example of a reference from an edited book


Liu, G. (1995). What National and community service means for higher education. In J. Galura & J. Holward's (Eds.) Praxis III: Voices in dialogue (pp. 9-15). Ann Arbor, Michigan: OCSL Press.

Example of a reference from a journal

Example 1

Mabry, J.B. (1998). Pedagogical variations in service-learning and student outcomes: How time, contact and reflection matter. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 5(3), 32-47.

A good source for APA help is:  http://www.docstyles.com/apacrib.htm

Elements to Remember When Writing

The majority of your paper should be written in your own words. Quotes may be used as long as they are cited but your paper should not consist of one quote after another. You need to lead into quotes with your own words. Do not put a quote in your paper without explaining the point you are trying to make in your own words. Whenever you use another person's idea, you must give that person credit by citing him or her.

All good papers have an introduction, a middle section, and a summary. Be sure to include an introductory paragraph in your paper that captures the reader's attention and explains what will follow in the rest of the paper. Each paragraph should start with a topic sentence which is a general statement supported with information in the following sentences in the paragraph. Typically, there should be a minimum of two sentences for a paragraph. You need transitions between paragraphs and between sentences so that they flow logically. Support your assertions with evidence from the literature. The summary section of your paper should touch on the main points you want the reader to remember. It is not a good idea to introduce new information in the summary. Also, in a formal paper it is best to write words out rather than using use contractions such as "can't."

To catch errors, I strongly suggest that you read your paper out loud. Also, it is a very good idea to have someone else read your paper to give you critical feedback that you can use on your final draft.

The instructor is willing to read first drafts of papers and give feedback up to (but not after) five days before the due date. Late papers are not accepted unless special arrangements have been made with the instructor. Requests for an extension on papers must be submitted in writing at least five days before the assignment is due.

Written reports will be graded according to the following:

Depth and quality of the research
25%
Adequacy of bibliography and appropriate use of citations  5%
Discussion of implications of the information obtained 25%
Conceptual clarity of the thesis, body and conclusion  25%
Organization of paper (heading, transitions, etc.)   10%
Grammar, spelling, sentence structure and punctuation 5% 
APA format  5%

 

 

 

APA Resources

The following site covers a multitude of writing issues - grammar, style, genre:

http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/general/index.html

The following two sites give examples of APA Style for the body of your paper as well as for the bib or reference list.

http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/research/r_apa.html#Handling%20Quotes%20In%20Your%20Text

http://www.apastyle.org/

Writing Consultant

The UMD Social Work Department has writing consultants available to help students who want to improve their writing skills in relationship to their course assignments. If you are interested in getting help, discuss this with one of your course instructors. If your instructor feels that you could benefit from professional writing consultation, he or she will refer you to him.

Disabilities

My highest priority is for our classroom and course work to facilitate participation and exchange. I am eager to make accommodations to
guarantee to students with disabilities access to class sessions, course materials, and the activities of the class. You are encouraged
to contact the Access Center-Disability Services to discuss and arrange reasonable accommodations (102 Kirby Center, tel. 726-8217). In
addition, please let me know as soon as possible if you have a disability for which accommodations will be requested. Note that you
are under no obligation to disclose the nature of your disability to me or other faculty.

Ground Rules for Class Discussion

We can assume that discrimination exists in many forms (e.g. sexism, racism, classism, ageism, homophobia, anti-Semitism, ableism, etc.).  Any critical understanding of these various "isms" means that we need to recognize that we have been taught misinformation about our own group as well as about members of other groups.  This is true for dominant (e.g., white, male, upper class, heterosexual, able-bodied, etc.) and subordinated (e.g., people of color, women, poor, working class, gay/lesbian, disabled, Jew, etc.) group members.  Based on these assumptions, then, let us agree that we cannot be blamed for misinformation we have learned, but we will be held accountable for repeating information after we have learned otherwise.  People and groups are not to be blamed for their subordinate positions.  Let us assume that people are always doing the best they can.  Let us actively pursue information about our own groups and those of others.  Let us share information about our own group with other members of the class but never demean, devalue, or in any other way put down people for their own experiences.  We each have an obligation to actively combat myths and stereotypes about our own groups so that we can break down the walls which prohibit group cooperation and group gain.  Let us create a safe environment for open discussion.

Attendance and Class Participation

Class participation is important because the exchange of ideas is necessary in the quest for knowledge.  Active class participation facilitates learning not only for the individual participating but for the other class members as well.  In order to obtain full credit for participation students need to attend all classes.  Students who miss more than three classes will fail the course. Each class period a sign-in sheet will be passed around.  It is your responsibility to sign this attendance sheet. Students who are not signed in will not earn any class participation points for that session.

Developing the ability to participate in a group discussion is essential in the social work field. In class students are expected at all times to demonstrate courteous listening skills.  In other words, when someone is speaking, others are quiet and attentive. 

Class participation will be graded as follows:

A = Excellent Participation includes frequent and appropriate contributions which:

  1. Pose good questions for the group
  2. Use relevant reading material to answer particular questions
  3. Invite others to contribute information or interpretations to the discussion
  4. Build on the comments of others
  5. Admit confusions, and ask for clarifications
  6. Give interpretations, explanations, opinions (sometimes personal)

B = Regular contributions that are not so integrative or interpretive such as:

  1. Offering discrete facts and some new information
  2. Single sentences or phrases, rather than more complex formulations
  3. Less connection with other participants in discussion

C = Little contribution such as:

  1. Speaking only a few times
  2. Offering just a little information
  3. Offering ideas that are vague or relatively unformulated
  4. Stating unsubstantiated opinions or educated guesses

D = Minimal participation such as:

  1. Usually saying nothing
  2. Speaking without having done the reading
  3. Speaking or making noises while another person has the floor

F = No participation.

Learning Assignments and Grade for Course

Learning Product Date Due Percent of Grade
Reflection Papers weekly 15
Class Participation weekly 15
Peer Evaluation monthly 5
Organizational Assessment first week of November 20
Community Project Paper Last week of semester 20
Presentation of Community Project Last two weeks of semester 10
Three presentations on progress/learning from community project monthly 15

Class Schedule

Class Date Theme & Activity Assignment
1 9-6

History of community organizing

Definitions of / differences between organizational types

What can go wrong in a group project?

Pre-test

Reading: Syllabus

Assignment: For next class period look up the mission statement for Patch,

Community Action Duluth, Clean Water Action and the NAACP

2 9-13

Potential community projects

Developing a mission statement

Speakers:

  • Cindy Donner, Patch
  • Dawn Hurst, Patch
  • Stan Kiefers, CAD
  • Sonia Bonialla, CAD
  • Jennifer Pigeon, CAD

Form groups for two projects

Reading: Hummel, pages 1-50

3 9-20

Tribal community organization

Reading: Peacock & Wissuri, Ojibwe Waasa Inaabidaa: We Look In All Directions, pages 1-159. (This is a beautifully written book with

many photos and pictures)

4 9-27

Structure and funding of organizations:

  • What is a non-profit, for-profit or governmental agency?
  • Incorporated or not?
  • Funding and budgets

Reading: Hummel, Starting and Running a Nonprofit Organization,

pages 51-144

Assignment for next class:

Go to the PAVSA website and read about the mission and structure of this non-profit organization PAVSA: Program for Aid to Victims of Sexual Assault

Turn in:

Peer Evaluation Form

5 10-4

Policies and procedures, bylaws, liability, working with boards

Types of boards and liability of board members

Speaker:

  • Candy Harshner, Executive Director of PAVSA

Reading: Kahn, Organizing:  A Guide for Grassroots Leaders,

pages 1-112

PAVSA bylaws and board member responsibilities

 

6 10-11

Core functions of administration; theories of management:

  • What is a bureaucracy?
  • How to change things in a bureaucracy

Network analysis

Assessing organizations and communities (SWAT exercise)

Reading: Cross, Making the Invisible Work Visable, pages 25-46

Cross & Prusak, The People Who Make Organizations Go--or Stop, pages 105-112

 

Handout:

Characteristics of a Bureaucracy

Meet at Patch located at 1406 East Second Street, Suite B

Try to carpool if you can

7 10-18 You are expected to attend sessions at the St. Louis County Conference this week for class

I suggest you attend one of the following sessions:

  • Caring About Caring: Staying Energized in These Times,Thursday, 10:30-11:45 a.m.
  • Reflective Leadership for the Careworn, Thursday, 8:30-10:00am
  • Harm Reduction and Housing First: Models and Practices in Duluth, Thursday, 8:30-10:00 a.m.
  • Dealing with Aggressive People, Thursday, 1:00-2:30 p.m.
  • Self-Care: Preventing Burnout, Thursday, 1:00-2:30 p.m.
  • Are Health and Human Services Supporting Human Rights? Thursday, 1:00-4:30 p.m.
  • Tension Today, Conflict Tomorrow: The Cost of Ignoring Cultural Differences, Thursday, 3:00-4:30 p.m.
  • We Need You to Help End Homelessness, Friday, 8:30-10:00 a.m.
  • Evaluating the Effectiveness of Duluth's Juvenile Fire Setter Program, Friday, 8:30-10:00 a.m.
  • Resource Mapping: A Visual Tool for Targeting Support Services, Strategic Planning, and Organizational Development, Friday, 8:30-10:00 a.m.
  • What Color is Your Leadership Style, Friday, 8:30-10:00 a.m.
  • What Might Be:  Appreciative Inquiry Techniques for Figuring Out Where Your Organization Is and Where It Might Go, Friday, 10:30-noon
  • Barriers to Oral Health:  The Problems People with Low Incomes Face in Accessing Dental Care, Friday, 10:30-noon
  • Professional Conduct and Ethical Practices, Friday, 10:30-noon
  • White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack, Friday, 1:30-3:00 p.m.
  • Leadership Style and Organizational Success, Friday, 1:30-3:00pm
  • Getting Low Income People into the "Ownership Society," Friday, 1:30-3:00 p.m.
8 10-25

Supervision, hiring, evaluation, motivation

  • Who is protected?
  • What is legal to ask?
  • ADA?
  • Affirmative action

Reading: Mor Barak, Beyond Affirmative Action:   Toward a Model of Diversity and Organizational Inclusion, pages 47-68

Handouts:

Legal Interviewing

Interview Questions to Ask

The Americans with Disabilities Act: A Primmer

An Employer's Guide to Employment Law

Who is protected and how?

Turn in:

Peer Evaluation Form

9 11-1

 

Organizational cultural competence.

 

Speaker:

John Day

Reading: Kahn, Organizing:  A Guide for Grassroots Leaders,

pages 113-204

  • Structure of Tribal Communities (knowing that all have unique aspects)
  • Social Service Organizations in Tribal Communities
  • What should non-American Indians and American Indians know about community organizing in tribal communities or working in tribal organizations

Handouts:

Organizational Elements of Cultural Competence

Organizational Assessment of Cultural Competence

located at http://www.aucd.org/councils/multicultural/

Cultural_Competence_Survey.htm

10 11-8

What motivates people

Gandhian principles, social work values and ethics

Speaker:

Cathryn Curley, Safe Haven Shelter

Reading:  Manning, Ethical Leadership in Human Services,

Chapters 2 & 9

Handouts:

Properly Conducted Performance Reviews Pay...

Sever Employee Ties the Right Way...

Thirteen Reasons People Don't Do What They're ...

11 11-15

Mobilizing an entire community

Models of community intervention

Video: Not in Our Town II. (54 minutes) VC 3555

Rothman, Approaches to Community Intervention, pages 26-63.

 


Turn in:
Organizational Assessment
12 11-22

Power, oppression and strategies of change:

Martin Luther King

Black Panthers

Women's movement

Activity: Star Power

Kahn, Organizing:  A Guide for Grassroots Leaders, pages 261-288

No written reflection due

13 11-29

Asset-based community development

Management tasks and effectiveness, leadership

  • Video: Democratic Promise: Saul Alinsky and His Legacy (1999) VC 3800

Video: Toxic Racism. (60 minutes) VC2443 pt. 2

Reading: Kretzmann & Mcknight, pages 345-354

Turn in:

Peer Evaluation Form

14 12-6 Student Presentations

Presentation on Community Projects

No written reflection due

15 12-13 Student Presentations

Presentation on Community Projects

Turn in:

Community Project Papers

No written reflection due

Bibliography

Barret, M. B. (1980).  Invisible lives.  New York: William Morrow and Company, Inc.

Beauchamp, Dan. (1981).  Lottery Justice.  Journal of Public Health Policy, 2 (3), 201-205.

Cook, K.S. (1986). Social exchange theory. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

Ginsberg, L.H. (Ed.). (1998). Social work in rural communities (3rd Ed.). Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education.

Haynes, K. S. & Mickelson, J. S. (1991).  Affecting change: Social workers in the political arena (2nd Ed.).  White Plains, NY: Longman.  

Homan, Mark S. (1994) Promoting community change: Making it happen in the real world.  Brooks/Cole.  Pacific Grove, California.

Jackson, Shirley.  (1975). The Lottery.  New York, NY: Popular Library.

Kahn, Si. (1991).  Organizing: A guide for grassroots leaders (Rev.Ed.).  Annapolis, MD: NASW Press.

Kahn, Si. (1994).  How people get power (Rev. Ed.).  Washington, DC: NASW Press.

Kirst-Ashman, K., Grafton, H. H., Jr. (1999).  The macro skills workbook: A generalist approach.  Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall Publishers.

Kotter, J.P. (1996). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Kretzmann, J. P. & Mcknight, J. L. (1993).  Building community from the inside out: A path toward finding and mobilizing a community=s assets.  Chicago, IL: The Asset-Based Community Development Institute.

Loewenberg, R.D. & Dolgoff, R. (1996).  Ethical decisions for social work practice (5th Ed.).  Itasca, IL: F.E. Peacock Publishers, Inc.

Meenaghan, T. M. & Gibbons, W. E. (2000).  Generalist practice in larger settings: Knowledge and skill concepts.  Chicago, IL: Lyceum Books, Inc.

Nair, K. (1994).  A higher standard of leadership: Lessons from the life of Gandhi.  San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. 

Not in Our Town II. (Video). A production of the Working Group; produced by Patrice O'Neill and Rhian Miller. Oakland, CA: Cal. Working Group, c1999. (54 minutes) VC 3555

O'Toole, J. (1996).  Leading change: The argument for values-based leadership.  New York: Ballantine Books.

Owen, H. (1997).  Expanding our now: The story of open space technology.  San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.

Parenti, M. (1994).  Land of idols: Political mythology in America.  New York: St. Martin=s Press

Rivera, F. G. & Erlich, J. L. (1998).  Community organizing in a diverse society, (3rd Ed.).  Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Rothman, J., Erlich, J. L. & Tropman, J. E. (2001).  Strategies of community intervention, (6th Ed.).  Itasca, IL: F.E. Peacock Publishers, Inc.

Strom-Gottfried, Kim.  (1999).  Social work practice: Cases, activities, and exercises.   Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.

Toxic Racism. (video) Produced for PBS by WGBH Boston. 1993 WGBH Educational Foundations. Distributed by Films for the Humanities & Sciences, Box 2053, Princeton, NJ 08543-2053.

Tropman, J.E., Erlich, J. L., & Rothman, J. (1995). Tactics and techniques of community intervention, (3rd Ed.).  Itasca, IL: F.E. Peacock Publishers, Inc.

Printable copy of the Group Project Peer Evaluation Form

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 

GROUP PROJECT PEER EVALUATION --COMMUNITY PROJECT

Adapted from a form created by Patricia Merrier, UMD Finance and Management Information Sciences

Circle the number that represents your rating of the group members on each criterion; use 1 as low and 5 as high.
Month
Member's Name -->

Self-rating

       
Provided valuable input during planning 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5
Actively participated in group discussions 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5
Assumed fair share of responsibility for project 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5
Attended group meetings OR had valid reason for not doing so and provided advance notice 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5
Listened to and respected other's input 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5
Accepted comments/criticism from other members (did not insist on having his/her way) 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5
Submitted work that met the quality standard of the group 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5
Provided quality input (appropriate and relevant information) 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5
Shared resources appropriately 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5
Willing to do work outside of the meeting 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5
Met deadlines for his/her share of the work 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5
Would you work on a group project with this person again? yes       no yes       no yes       no yes       no yes       no
Should this person receive the grade assigned to the written and oral reports?

yes       no

no- higher

no- lower

yes       no

no- higher

no- lower

yes       no

no- higher

no- lower

yes       no

no- higher

no- lower

yes       no

no- higher

no- lower

Dates of meetings

1st meeting

2nd meeting 2nd meeting 2nd meeting 3rd meeting

Summary describing what happened during the meeting

         
Evaluation of how well the group is working together 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5 1  2  3  4  5

Web Resources:

http://www.nyu.edu/socialwork/wwwrsw/ has been substantially upgraded and currently contains 65,000 links. In the past year they removed approximately 2000 links to lower quality services and have added approximately 7000 new links. The majority of these links are to the literature--full text scientific, technical and policy reports. In addition, this site contains links to 2200 scholarly journals and newsletters, of which, 110 are to sites that provide full text articles. A wide range of links to relevant government agencies, educational institutions and professional organizations are also included. This site is updated daily and has been in operation since 1994.

www.congress.org

http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/links/norms-Aug2003.html Standards for transnational corporations with regard to human rights

http://www.goodforminnesota.org/ Information and ideas for action regarding the budget crisis.