King Arthur – The Once and Future King

Prefatory Statement: The literature surrounding King Arthur has captured the attention and hearts of readers ever since Geoffrey of Monmouth’s The History of the Kings of Britain. Within 30 years of his creation, numerous stories of King Arthur were created, and since that time, the twelfth century, the number has kept multiplying. Many of the stories and events central to King Arthur’s life have been written from a variety of perspectives. It is a subject that has been consistently open to analysis and interpretation; therefore, the performance package created to be a part of this unit will focus on the standard Arts Analysis and Interpretation.

Through this substandard students can explore issues of class, morality, chivalry, and gender, which has been, and will be central to peoples’ lives throughout eternity. Hopefully questions such as: "Are people still stuck into the social class in which they were born?" and "Has morality been lost in the modern world, or has it improved through better treatment of minorities and females?" can be explored if not answered.

In order to meet such goals, the unit will include analysis of narrative structure, analysis of literary work, the creation of a class anthology, and many other activities. These projects will be complimented by discussions on Arthurian history, social structure within the literature, womens’ roles in the literature, and chivalric acts in the past and present. These discussions will be based on the readings of "Sir Gawain and the Green Knight," Andrea Hopkins’ "The Quest of the Holy Grail," and sections from other literature such as "Pyle’s The Story of King Arthur and His Knights, Malory’s Le Morte D’Arthur, and most importantly, from the origin of Arthur as we know him, Monmouth’s The History of the Kings of Britain.

Class Specification: This unit is created for students in eleventh or twelfth grade. Because of the wide availability of translations, King Arthur literature can be read by people of any age. However, in order to complete this unit, students should have some previous exposure to literary analysis, which makes this unit appropriate for higher grades. Unfortunately, most, if not all, of the characters in this literature are Caucasian characters, which makes it more difficult for some students to relate to the characters than others. Different literature would be more appropriate and just as able to meet the objectives of this unit in classrooms that are richly diverse in culture and race. On the other hand, the literature can be used for students of any socio-economic class. None of the students will be able to relate to the grandeur style that King Arthur and his court lived in, but all will be familiar to its characteristics from its continuous use in other media. Arthurian literature should not, however, be dismissed as trivial or irrelevant because of this. It is at this particular age that students begin to notice and reflect upon the different ways that females and low socio-economic people are treated. Arthurian literature takes place during a time when treatment of these peoples was dramatically different than we like to think that it is today. The distance between the student’s world and the text can be used to instigate discussions on inequality appropriate for this age level.

Significant Assumptions:

In writing this unit I have assumed that:

Desired Outcomes:

Students will be able to demonstrate all standard specifications listed under the Minnesota High School Graduation Standard Arts Analysis and Interpretation. After completion of assessment tasks, students will be able to demonstrate the ability to interpret and evaluate complex works of literature by:

  1. describing the elements and structure of literature; the artistic intent; and the historical, cultural, and social background of the selected literature;
  2. applying specific critical criteria to interpret and analyze the selected literature;
  3. describing how particular effects are produced by the artist’s use of the elements of literature; and
  4. communicating an informed interpretation using the vocabulary of literature.

By the end of the unit, students will have also learned:

Possible Whole-Class Activities:

Possible Small-Group Activities:

Possible Individual Activities:

Ongoing Activities:

After reading the two short stories, "Sir Gawain and the Green Knight," and "The Quest of the Holy Grail" and holding a class discussion, students will select a piece of more modern King Arthur literature from a recommended list and begin writing responses to their stories in their literature logs. Included in their responses should be a description of the characters, identification of themes found throughout the work, descriptions of the author’s use of formal elements, and their general reactions to the work. They should have finished reading the book by the middle of the fourth week.

Student Resources:

Unit Launch: Week One, Day One, 50 minute lesson

Objectives: By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

Methods:

Explain to students the content of the unit and the work that they will be asked to do in conjunction with the unit for the Grad Standard Literary Arts and Analysis. (10 minutes)

Watch a short clip from The First Knight where Lancelot rescues Guinevere. (10 minutes)

Hold a class discussion. Discuss how chivalric and heroic ideals have changed. Ask students:

  1. What is considered a great heroic act today?
  2. How can positive role models be considered heroic or chivalric? (5 minutes)

Explain to students that in-groups of two they will be looking  through the community paper for a person who they believe represents a positive role model and/or has performed a heroic act. At the same time, tell students to examine the way journalists write a story. Have students split into groups and hand out the newspapers. (5 minutes)

Give students time to find and agree to one person in the community that fits their notions of chivalry and heroic acts or persona. Ask them to jot down the person they decided on, the reason for their decision, and if they had any difficulty agreeing on one person. (10-15 minutes)

Ask a few groups to tell the whole class their selection and reason for it. Give homework assignment and collect the other group’s papers on the community member they choose. (5-10 minutes)

Homework: For the next week, search the paper for a person who you believe to be a hero or chivalrous person and would like to interview. Once you find such a person write an entry in your journal explaining your choice and questions that you would ask him or her if given the opportunity to interview that person.

Assessment:

I know students will have met the objectives if:

Organization of the Unit:

Week 1

After the unit launch on day 1, which is used as a pre-reading exercise, a brief lecture on day two about Arthurian literature will be given. They will then be assigned a common character from this literature to research, such as Morgan le Fay, Merlin, Arthur, Guenevere, Modered, Galahad, Sir Kay, Gawain, and Lancelot. After this research, which can be done through movies, literature, library sources, and the WWW, students will be asked to write a poem about this character, or if they choose, a short scene incorporating two of the characters. These should be finished and ready to share by the end of the week. After reading their creation, they, the "experts," may be asked questions about their characters and their role in the literature (assignment can be found later in the unit).

In the meantime, students will read "Sir Gawain and the Green Knight." This will lead to discussions on chivalry and the women’s roles in the story. Essays on women’s roles in the literature can be found on the WWW at the Arthurian Studies site listed at the end of the unit.

For the weekend, students will be asked to read the first half of Hopkins’ "The Quest of the Holy Grail" and make their final selection for the interview they will do the following week. They should make two selections in case they are unable to get in touch with or interview their first choice.

Week 2

Students will finish reading "The Quest of the Holy Grail," and we will examine chivalry within the story. The class discussion could start by asking students to respond in their literature logs to this question, "Which knights are exemplary examples of chivalry and why are they?" Some students will most likely respond by writing about the failings of many of the knights, which would be a good point for discussion.

During this week, students must also contact their modern day hero and set up an interview after we have held a class discussion about interview techniques. This activity will probably be more manageable if students whom selected the same person are allowed to work together by each student taking one half of the interview. However, I would not mention this until students have stated whom they would like to interview in order to get students to work with classmates that they usually do not interact with.

The class will also examine the structure of the two short stories that we have read. This can be done through a contemporary model of Freitag’s Pyramid (Noden 143). In Harry Noden’s book Image Grammar you can also find seven common plot patterns to be discussed. In order to prepare students to analyze the stories they will soon begin to read, it would b beneficial to examine one of the short stories in class and ask students to do the other on their own. Afterwards, the narrative structure and plot pattern of the second story would be discussed with the whole class.

For Monday, students will begin reading a book from the following list (found on the WWW) and write a rough draft of their interview in the format of a newspaper article.

Options for student selected literature:

Lesson Plan: Week 2, Day 3, 50 minute lesson

Objectives: By the end of this lesson students will be able to:

Methods:

Select one of the students’ modern day heroes. Have the whole class generate questions to be asked during an interview with this community member. (5-10 minutes)

Discuss the types of questions to avoid when interviewing someone. Evaluate the current questions to see if any need to be eliminated or reworded. (5 minutes)

Discuss interviewing techniques, such as eye contact, verbal responses, facial expressions, etc. (5 minutes)

Ask for two volunteers, one to be the interviewer and the other the interviewee. Set them up in front of the classroom to role-play the interview. (10 minutes)

Have the class give the two volunteers feedback. What went well? What could have been done differently? How did the interviewer appear interested? (5-10 minutes)

Divide the students into groups if they have selected the same person to interview, and tell them to generate at least 10 questions for the interview before they leave the classroom. (10 minutes)

Homework: Finish writing the interview questions and contact the person to be interviewed. Set up a time for the interview outside of school, which should take place before the following Monday. Make any special travel arrangements that are needed for students. Start looking at the books on the list for student selected literature and decide which book you will read by Friday.

Assessment:

I know students will have met the objectives if:

Week 3

The week will start with students peer editing one another’s articles and polishing them for publication, first for the class and secondly for the anthology. Students will also be given time in class each day to read their selected piece of literature and make entries in their literature logs. This will hopefully get students into the literature, so they will have the self-motivation to finish it on their own time. Because students will be spending a great amount of time reading that piece of literature, the only other assigned reading for the week will be a short piece from Monmouth’s The History of the Kings of Britain, "Utherpendragon Sires Arthur."

Week 4

By day four of this week, students should have finished the piece of work that they selected to read. They should also have read the assigned section from Pyle’s The Story of King Arthur and His Knights, which describes how King Arthur was persuaded into a beheading game and how Gawain met his wife. This story can be easily compared to "Sir Gawain and the Green Knight." Discussion of the two stories should answer the questions "What do the women in each story have in common?" and "What are the similarities and differences between the two games?"

The rest of the time in class will be spent reading and creating a rough plot diagram and storyboard of Pyle’s story along with discussing the elements of a short story and its effects. The plot diagram will be created in small groups, but the storyboard will be a whole class activity because of its unfamiliarity to many students.

When creating a storyboard, "students extract a series of events from a text to create a script based on these events. They then transform these events into scenes, portraying characters as stick-figures. For each scene, they describe the use of camera shots (close-up, medium, long shot, wide-angle), angles (from above vs. below), time (number of seconds), special effects (slow motion, dissolve, fades, freeze frame, and so on), lighting effects, and dialogue" (Beach and Marshall 115). Storyboards force students to be analytical of the work. To define a storyboard further, drawings are put on a piece of tag board and divided into sections, much like a cartoon, with dialogue written beneath the drawings. The drawings are simpler when compared to a cartoon, but the directions (stage directions) become very detailed. For example, when creating a storyboard for Pyle’s work, questions such as: "Are we going to tell the story from the point of view of a certain character?" and "How would certain characters position themselves towards other characters?" should be answered before creating the storyboard. Students will be encouraged to start working on their own plot diagram and storyboard at home.

Elements of a short story (majority of definitions taken from Fictions):

  1. Third-person omniscient
  2. Third-person limited omniscient
  3. First-person
  4. Objective

Lesson Plan: Week Four, Day Four, 50 minute lesson

Objectives: By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

Method:

Ask students to answer the following questions in their literature logs:

  1. What was the conflict in Pyle’s work?
  2. How was a resolution reached? (5 minutes)

Divide the students into groups of four, hand out a big sheet of paper, and tell students to make plot diagrams that depict the pattern of events through drawings. Tell students to represent each of the components on Freitag’s Pyramid. (20-25 minutes)

Have each group show the whole class their plot diagram and briefly explain how they chose to represent each of the story’s components: setting, set up, rising action, climax, falling action, resolution. (10-15 minutes)

Answer any questions regarding a conflict over how groups choose as the components of the story, how they chose to represent them, and how to create their own plot diagram. (5-10 minutes)

Homework: Students should come to class having identified all of the components of a narrative structure in their own work. They should also write in their literature logs about which character they would have chosen to tell the story if they were the authors of the work.

Assessment:

I know students will have met the objectives if:

Week 5 and Week 6

Until day four continue to work on the storyboards in class and discuss any issues that arise. From day four of week five until day four of the final week, students will spend time in class working on their plot diagrams, storyboards, and written analyses of their literary work. Day three of week six will be spent peer-editing the written analyses as day four and day five will be spent presenting the information to the whole class. If any time is left, I would choose to show the rest of "The First Knight."

Assignments:

Assignment 1 – Due week 1, day 5

King Arthur Unit

Your assignment is to research a common character (from the list below) in Arthurian Literature and write a poem about this character. When researching, look at a few of the stories, consider what we have already read, watch a movie portraying an Arthurian story, go to the library and on the Web. Show me that you spent time researching this character; put all your sources on a work cited sheet. I expect to see at least three sources. If you prefer to write a short scene with your chosen character and another, you may do that instead of a poem. Otherwise, there are no restrictions. These will be shared with the rest of the class and possibly published in the class anthology. After your reading you may be asked questions pertaining to that character. Dazzle us!

One source for information on the common characters is located at:

http://www.britannia.com/history/artbios.html

Common characters in Arthurian literature:

You will be graded on:

Assignment 2 – due week 3, day 3

King Arthur Unit

Your assignment is to look through the community paper and find a person whom you consider to be a modern day hero, role model, and chivalrous. After our discussion in class about interviewing, you are required to write 15 appropriate questions for the interview, contact the community member, interview him or her, and write an article in the format of a newspaper about his or her great deed(s). A rough draft of the article is due on day 1 of week 3, and the final draft is due on day 3 of week 3. Along with the polished article, you will hand in the questions that you wrote and a short reflection. The reflection should answer these questions:

How does my article reflect the conventions used by newspaper journalists?

If I could do the interview over, what would I change?

What was the best question that I asked and why?

You will be graded on:

Grade for the unit is determined as follows:

100-92=A

91-84=B

83-75=C

74-66=D

65- ß =F

Learning Area: Literature and the Arts

Level: High School

Content Standard: Literature and arts analysis and interpretation – Literature

Task: Analyze Narrative Structure

Standard:

A student shall demonstrate the ability to interpret and evaluate complex works of literature by:

  1. describing the elements and structure of literature; the artistic intent;

    and the historical, cultural, and social background of the selected literature;

  2. applying specific critical criteria to interpret and analyze historical, cultural, and social background the selected literature;
  3. describing how particular effects (mood, personal response) are produced by the artist’s use of the elements of literature (plot, setting, theme, characterization, point of view); and
  4. communicating an informed interpretation using the vocabulary of literature (symbolism, allusion, figurative language, plot, setting, theme, characterization, point of view, exposition, conflict, rising action, climax, falling action, and resolution).

 

Products/Evidence of Learning:

Plot Diagram

Storyboard

Written analysis of process and work

Task Description:

Overview: Students select a piece of Arthurian literature, analyze the narrative structure through the creation of a plot diagram, develop a storyboard based on one of its key event/scene, and evaluate the process of creating a storyboard. The plot diagram and storyboard will be used as aids in a presentation for the class.

  1. Read one work of Arthurian literature. Analyze the narrative structure of the work by creating a plot diagram that graphically depicts the pattern of events (dramatic tension and release; conflict and resolution) in the story. Each element on Freitag’s Pyramid must be depicted.
  2. Next, develop a storyboard based on the work’s narrative structure that has at least six sections. If you feel that the key event cannot be captured in six sections, you may use two tag boards. The storyboard can show setting, conflicts, and character relationships in more detail than the plot diagram. In creating the storyboard, portray a selected key event/scene. Determine what criteria you will use to select the event. For example, one way to select key events is to see plot as driven by characters; the climax, its resolution, and the effects on the characters become critical features in understanding theme. Therefore, one criterion to use in the selection of key events is that of the illumination of character. Elements that should be included in the storyboard are camera angles, time, special effects, lighting effects, and dialogue. Other elements that may be considered are background music, location for shooting, etc. Divide the tag board into six sections and draw the characters as stick figures if you are not artistically talented. Around the characters should be the details about the above elements. For example, you might write that a certain image would slowly dissolve from the screen. Make sure that you have reasons for your decisions. Dialogue is written beneath each section.
  3. Finally, write a two to three page description evaluating the process and explaining how you made your decisions. How did you choose which scene to portray? How did you choose which point of view your storyboard would be told from? What kind of effects did your artistic/technical decisions make in your creation? What kind of information would you have liked to have been given from the author or was it all fully explained? Do you believe that your creation better illustrates the scene when compared to the literature? Why or why not?

Checklist for Task 1

Y=Yes

N=No Evidence Shown

Student Teacher

______ The plot diagram accurately depicts: ______

           _____ the functions of a short story’s components.
           _____ the relationships among the components of a
                      short story.

______ The plot diagram consistently incorporates ______

             vocabulary of the literary form.

______ The storyboard is complete by including a ______

            description of the following elements:
             _____ camera angles
             _____ time
             _____ special effects
             _____ lighting effects
             _____ dialogue.

______ The dialogue in the storyboard is realistic and ______

             is told from and reasonable point of view.

______ The setting is fully explained. ______

______ The analysis of the process answers all of the ______

             questions in the task description.

Learning Area: Literature and the Arts

Level: High School

Content Standard: Literature and arts analysis and interpretation – Literature

Task: Comprehensive Analysis of a Literary Work

Standard:

A student shall demonstrate the ability to interpret and evaluate complex works of literature by:

  1. describing the elements and structure of literature; the artistic intent; and the historical, cultural, and social background of the selected literature;
  2. applying specific critical criteria to interpret and analyze historical, cultural, and social background the selected literature;
  3. describing how particular effects (mood, personal response) are produced by the artist’s use of the elements of literature (plot, setting, theme, characterization, point of view); and
  4. communicating an informed interpretation using the vocabulary of literature (symbolism, allusion, figurative language, plot, setting, theme, characterization, point of view, exposition, conflict, rising action, climax, falling action, and resolution).

 

Products/Evidence of Learning:

Analysis of a literary work

Task Description:

Overview: Students will select a piece of Arthurian literature (the same as in Task 1). They will then research its author, any previous work that may have influenced the author, and social, political, and cultural events of the time period in which the work was written. Along with these elements, the students will include their reaction to the text and descriptions of the writer’s use of the formal elements of fiction with examples. This will not only include the elements on Freitag’s Pyramid, but also such elements as symbolism, allusion, figurative language, plot, setting, theme, characterization, point of view, exposition, conflict, rising action, climax, falling action, and resolution. These finding will be presented to the class.

  1. Choose a piece of Arthurian literature (same as in Task 1) from the approved list.
  2. When reading the work, make notes in your literature log about themes found throughout the work (at least 3), your general reactions to the work, and descriptions of the writer’s use of formal elements of fiction. These elements would include the ones listed on Freitag’s Pyramid along with symbolism, figurative language, allusion, characterization, and any of the other above elements that have been discussed in class.
  3. Find information about the author, historical, social, and cultural events of the time period in which the work was written and describe how these factors influenced the development of the work or are reflected in the work. Even though the work may have been written recently consider such questions as: where does (or did) the author live, did that have any bearing on the work, what works might have influenced the author, what life events might have affected authorial intent, and what cultural events were popular in the area and time period in which the author lived?
  4. Your findings must be typed up in a readable format in order for me to know that you did each step. Chart Freitag’s Pyramid with the stories actions in place of the elements names. Ask each question in number three and follow it with an answer.
  5. Present all of this information (themes, reactions, descriptions of formal elements, background information) to the class using your plot diagrams and storyboards as aids in your presentation. You will need some other type of visual aid to clarify all of the information that you are presenting. Some options are PowerPoint, transparencies, handouts, or tag board.

Checklist for Task 2

Y=Yes

N=No evidence shown

Student Teacher

______ The analysis effectively connects elements and ______

             structure with effect and artistic intent.

______ The analysis consistently connects background ______

             and context with meaning and point of view.

______ The analysis repeatedly incorporates the ______

             vocabulary of the literary form.

______ Interpretation of the work is consistent with the ______

             analysis.

______ Examples and specific details are used to support ______

             the found themes.

______ Examples and specific details are used to support ______

            descriptions of the author’s formal elements.

______ Findings have been typed in a readable format. ______

______ Plot diagram and storyboard is used to illustrate ______

             the analysis.

______ Another visual aid is used during the presentation ______

             to clarify meaning for the audience.

______ Sources are cited on the extra visual aid. ______

Presentation Rubric

For 15 points:

For 10 points:

For 5 points:

Learning Area: Literature and the Arts

Level: High School

Content Standard: Literature and arts analysis and interpretation – Literature

Task: Class Anthology

The following is a brief description of a revised task which can be found at

http://mecr.state.mn.us/ppconsview?PP_ID=30412&GYEAR=2002. This is a task that would be worked on throughout the year, and it would include written work from other units as well as this one. A detailed task description and checklist would be included in a later unit.

Evidence of Learning:

Individually created works and introductions contributed to the class anthology.

Extended definition of story

Task Summary:

Overview: Students will work together as a class to produce a class anthology with student created work. They will select creative writing and critical analyses, one of each from every student, to be published in the anthology. Creative writing selections must be polished and preceded by an introduction, which explains the context from which it came. Each critical analysis will be preceded by an introduction containing: bibliographic information, summary of the author’s work, and an explanation of the value of each selection to the reader. After the anthology is published, students will review all of the contributed critical analyses and write and extended definition of a story. Included in this definition will be the criteria for what makes a story and a detailed explanation of the value of a good story. In order for the definition to be considered complete, students must have:

Once all tasks have been completed, students will be scored based on the following rubric.

Scoring Criteria

Arts and Literature

The High School Level

Scores are ranked 4-1 with 4 being highest score and 1 being lowest. Scores reflect a professional judgment based on multiple evidence of sustained student work over time.

To receive a score of 4, a student:

To receive a score of 3, a student:

To receive a score of 2, a student:

To receive a score of 1, a student:

 

 

Teacher Resources (note: The required section from Pyle’s work is included in Modern Arthurian Literature: An Anthology of English and American Arthuriana from the Renaissance to the Present):

"Arts and Literature: Arthurian Studies." 5 Nov. 1999.      

       <http://historymedren.about.com/education/historymedren/msubarth.htm>.

Beach, Richard, and James Marshall. Teaching Literature in the        

       Secondary School.Orlando: Harcourt Brace, 1991.

Gere, Anne Ruggles., et. al. Language and Reflection: An Integrated

       Approach to Teaching English. Upper Saddle River, New

       Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1992.

Hopkins, Andrea. Chronicles of King Arthur. New York: Viking

       Penguin, 1993.

"Le Morte d’ Arthur: The Legend of the King." 12 Nov. 1999.

       <http://school.discovery.com/lessonplans/programs/arthur/activities.html>.

Lupak, Alan ed. Modern Arthurian Literature: An anthology of

       English and American Arthuriana from the Renaissance to the

       Present. New York: Garland, 1992.

"MECR Performance Package Consolidated View." 25 Oct. 1999.

       <http://mecr.state.mn.us/ppconsview?PP_ID=30412&GYEAR=2002>.

Noden, Harry R. Image Grammar: Using Grammatical Structures to        

       Teach Writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 1999.

Trimmer, Joseph F., and C. Wade Jennings, eds. Fictions. 3rd ed.

       New York: Harcourt Brace College Publishers, 1994.