POL 3652: HISTORY OF POLITICAL THOUGHT II
[MODERNITY AND ITS CRITICS]
Spring 2005
Exam 2
INSTRUCTIONS
Follow the instructions for each of the following four parts of the exam.
In your answers, please don't quote verbatim from the texts and/or paraphrase
them (unless instructed to do so). This demonstrates little beyond
your secretarial skills and ability to read.
The exam must be given to me by noon on Tuesday, April 12.
PART I
Answer any one of the following three questions:
- Ch. 26 of Capital is entitled "The Secret of Primitive
Accumulation", referring to Marx's contention that the supposed origins
of capitalism are a myth. What is that myth? What
is the reality, according to Marx?
- What is the role of force in the emergence of capitalism, according
to Marx (esp. in Ch. 26 of Capital)?
- List the punishments
for failure to work that Marx mentions in Ch. 28
of Capital. What punishments are there today for failure
to work?
PART II
Answer the following question:
- Sticking closely to the actual text of the Manifesto,
describe what Marx saw as the nature of the conflict between the bourgeoisie
and the proletariat. [700 words max]
PART III
Answer any one of the following four questions (1-4):
- Honneth names three forms
of recognition. For
any two of these, give an example of a social conflict
(ones not covered in class or in the text, but either current
or historical) that can be considered a struggle for that
form of recognition. Be
sure to explain the connection between each form of recognition
and its associated social conflict. [700 words max]
- Honneth names three
forms of recognition. For any two of
these, give an example from your
own life where you yourself struggled for
that form of recognition. Be
sure to explain the connection between each
form of recognition and what you experienced. [700
words max]
- One social conflict in our society is that
between the KKK (and other white
supremacists) and the rest of the society (esp. Blacks,
of course, but effectively against
everyone). Can
this conflict be interpreted in
Honneth's terms — i.e., be seen
as a struggle for recognition? [500 words max]
- Interpret
the social conflict in the
Terri Schiavo case in terms of a struggle
for recognition. [500
words max]
PART IV
Answer either one of the two questions below:
- Honneth is considered a "critical theorist" in that his theory can be
used to reveal flaws in the existing society. What flaws
does it reveal in capitalist society? Or to put this another
way, what aspects of capitalism inherently work against recognition
in Honneth's sense? [You could write a book about this,
but limit your answer to 700 words.]
- Evaluate the following statement: "When understood most deeply,
social conflicts are indeed about recognition, not the distribution
of material goods and power." [You could write a book about this
too, but limit your answer to 700 words. Note that the term "evaluate" does
not require you to take a position completely pro or con (although you may
choose to do so); it permits you to take an intermediate or mixed
position.]
Page URL: http://www.d.umn.edu/~schilton/3652/3652.Exam2.2005.Spring.html
Author: Stephen
Chilton [email] | Last
Modified: 2005-04-05
Honor Roll
| UMD | Pol
Sci Department
The University of Minnesota is
an equal opportunity educator and employer.
Copyright © 2005 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights
reserved.