John Rawls (1993). [Excerpts from] Political Liberalism. In L&W (2003:633-648).
John Rawls (1993). Political Liberalism. NY: Columbia.
John Rawls
(1921-2002), b. Baltimore, grad. Princeton (A.B., 1943; Ph.D., 1950). Rawls taught
at Princeton (1950–52), Cornell (1953–59), and the Massachusetts Institute
of Technology (1960–62) before becoming (1962) professor of philosophy at
Harvard. He was subsequently elected president of the American Philosophical
Association and served as department head of Harvard's Philosophy Department.
What is justice? What is a just society? How can we create a society organized around principles that people will be committed to, particularly when we find people with vastly different normative / spiritual commitments?
xx
xx
[Question on this subtopic]
[Question on this subtopic]
xx
[Question on this subtopic]
Political Liberalism (1993) is Rawls's reply to various criticisms of A Theory of Justice (1971). In some cases Rawls corrects his earlier work (e.g., in his new treatment of "just savings"), while in other cases he sees his task as simply clarification. Perhaps the most important clarification is that he did not intend his theory of justice ("justice as fairness") to provide a new metaphysical ground for all political philosophy; rather, it is simply a political conception, by which he seems to mean something that reasonable people can agree on to solve a particular practical problem.
One central aspect of this clarification is his concept of an "overlapping consensus". Rawls acknowledges that people will differ in many aspects of their value positions, but ending this plurality of positions would require completely unacceptable levels of ideological repression. In other words, he is saying, we are stuck with the fact that people see the world in different ways, "stuck" because in our society, at least, we aren't willing to countenance what would be necessary to eliminate that plurality. All he is looking for is a conception of how we can deal with each other in the face of this pluralism.
Rawls therefore regards "justice as fairness" as simply a position that all people can agree too, even if they differ in their more general value commitments. In our society we have (or could have), according to Rawls, an "overlapping consensus" that his theory is "the most appropriate conception of justice for specifying the fair terms of social cooperation between citizens regarded as free and equal, and as fully cooperating members of society over a complete life, from one generation to the next" (633/A/1/end).
The University of Minnesota is
an equal opportunity educator and employer.
Copyright © 2004 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights
reserved.