"DEEP IMPACT" & "ARMAGEDDON"
VS. "JURASSIC PARK" & "XX": A CRITICAL ANALYSIS
Hubris: In Greek tragedy, the sin or fault of excessive
pride, particularly the likening of one's powers to those of the gods,
generally resulting in catastrophe as the gods reveal one's inability to
control one's fate.
I start with a few background assumptions:
-
at a macro level, the government is interested in bringing as much profit
as possible to the owning class.
-
profit is maximized to the extent that the people can be persuaded to part
with their money for high-profit-margin items.
-
profit margins are maximized to the extent that the people can be persuaded
to buy goods with only symbolic (abstract) value, or with the greatest
ratio of symbolic value to actual production cost.(1)
-
the sectors in which the highest profit margins occur are the defense industry
(which produces an unmeasurable, easily manipulable commodity called "national
security") and the space program (which produces ... what? - a smidgen
of scientific data? a sense of national pride? support for the military?).(2)
The underlying theme of "Jurassic Park" (19xx) was that nature cannot be
controlled by humans. Even though the entrepreneur who created the park
(the John Huston character), repeatedly says he "spared no expense" in
its construction, including its safety features, the combination of oversights,
human frailty, and bad luck made these as naught. Human determination (and
good luck, this time) enabled the humans to survive - but by no means to
prevail, being fortunate to have escaped with their lives, and with the
park in ruins.
[More to come. January 6, 1999]
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 06:33:39 -0500 (Central Daylight Time)
From: Stephen Chilton <schilton@d.umn.edu>
To: cblood@newsguy.com
Subject: Re: NYTimes.com Article: Forget Nature. Even Eden Is Engineered.
[8/20/2002 article by Andrew C. Revkin]
Thanks for sending this. Can we understand the world well enough
to prevent it from going haywire beyond our ability to recover, or is it
just hubris to think so? Even if we could do so, would we have the
political will to do so? There is a good argument to be made that
technology can keep us ahead of the problems it creates, but I don't think
that it can keep us from the unjust practices that it would require to
do so.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
xx
FOOTNOTES
1. See Goffman (19xx, 19xx) for an exposition of
the concept of symbolic vs. concrete benefits.
2. Ref: [postcard ref]
Page URL: http://www.d.umn.edu/~schilton/Articles/Hubris.html
Page Author: Stephen Chilton
Link to Home Page: www.d.umn.edu/~schilton/index.html
Last Modified: December 4, 1999
Mail suggestions and comments, especially re. typos and other errors,
to: schilton@d.umn.edu
Honor Roll of Proofreaders and Colleagues: www.d.umn.edu/~schilton/Honor.html
This way to the UMD homepage
This way to the Political Science
Department home page
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity
educator and employer.
Copyright © 1999 Regents of the University
of Minnesota. All rights reserved.