| Home:
Tim Roufs |
Advanced
Writing: Social Sciences Cutting Costs for College Textbooks |
24 October 2025
|
|
|
Date: _________________________ |
|
| Class: _________________________ |
| Rating Scale: | 1-2 Poor | 3-4 Fair | 5-6 Average | 7-8 Good | 9-10 Superior | NA -- Not Applicable |
| Speaker's Name: |
________________________________________________ |
||
| Evaluator's Name: | ________________________________________________ |
|
Comments
|
||||||||
| The Speaker: |
1. | introduced self | 1. ________ | |||||
| 2. | understood the material well | 2. ________ | ||||||
| 3. | spoke slowly enough | 3. ________ | ||||||
| 4. | looked at the audience | 4. ________ | ||||||
| 5. | looked confident | 5. ________ | ||||||
| 6. | spoke loudly enough | 6. ________ | ||||||
| The Presentation: |
7. | made plain right away what was being proposed | 7. ________ | |||||
| 8. | offered good reasons | 8. ________ | ||||||
| 9. | defined difficult or technical words | 9. ________ | ||||||
| 10. | backed the reasons with evidence | 10. ________ | ||||||
| 11. | mentioned and replied to pertinent objections | 11. ________ | ||||||
| 12. | seemed feasible in this case | 12. ________ | ||||||
| 13. | made plain the need for action | 13. ________ | ||||||
| 14. | was organized and easily followed | 14. ________ | ||||||
| 15. | made a call for action | 15. ________ | ||||||
| 16. | was suitable for the particular audience | 16. ________ | ||||||
| The Questions: |
17. | were answered clearly | 17. ________ | |||||
| 18. | were answered substantively | 18. ________ | ||||||
| The Visuals: |
19. | effective | 19. ________ | |||||
| 20. | were integrated into the presentation | 20. ________ | ||||||
| Source: UMD Department of Composition, n.d. (Original place of publication unknown.) | ||||||||
© 1998
- 2023 Timothy G. RoufsPage URL: http:// www.d.umn.edu /claweb/faculty/troufs/comp3160/speech_evaluation.html Last Modified 08:37:38 GMT 23 April 2002 Site Information ~ Main A-Z Index |
|