Evidence

Home

The Incident

The Cast

The Natural History of a Lawsuit

Legalities

[Note: Selection of the proper form and its use and modification to suit individual facts and circumstances requires careful review of all the language by the user.]

CIVJIG 12.25 Impeachment

Guidelines for impeachment

[1. You may consider what the witness did or said in the past, if it is not consistent with what he or she is saying now.

If what was said in the past was not under oath, use it only to decide the truth or weight of what the witness is saying now.

If it was under oath, or the witness is a party in this case (or an agent for one of the parties), then use it to decide the issues in this case and the truth and weight of what the witness is saying now.]

[2. You may consider whether the witness has been convicted of a crime. You may consider whether the kind of crime makes it more likely that he or she is not telling the truth.]

[3. You may consider a witness's reputation for truthfulness.]


The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer
© 2001 School of Medicine Duluth

for more information: bateman@halversonwatters.com
Halverson, Watters, Downs, Reyelts & Bateman

webmaster: mpollock@d.umn.edu
Miranda Pollock